I think Chi-Nu II can solve this problem well. Why we add Chi-Nu II for BRIII
25 Likes
I think that there is more than enough poke in the three tanks, and it is not necessary to have each country and each BR perfectly aligned.
Assuming you are talking about the Type 3 Chi Nu.
How is 100mm of penetration more than enough? It canβt even pen the upper front plate of the M4A2. While the M4A2 can pen it from basically anywhere.
Except this tank is not similar to Sherman tank? That will be T-34-76. Chi-Nu II is more similar to long barrel panzer 4 Germany have on br3.
2 Likes
While we are at it, could we bring the Na-To down to BR2?
1 Like
And replace HE and APCR round count with each other. 16 HE and 7 APCR
1 Like
I mean, that too I guess, but Iβd be happy with just moving it down to BR2
Just remove its APCR, since its APCR is useless at br2 anyway.
1 Like