Well, there’s J1, Puma and marder
But I agree, I would lower StuG F to BR2 as well. And give few heats (for example 7) to howitzer tanks.
2 Likes
Is the 3J with long barrel (was that L?) Br2?
I remember I really loved that one. At least it pierced stuff.
It’s probably why my favourite is the 3M. They look similar
1 Like
I understand how the EU forum meme “stug on 2br” 
3L it lies in the editor and waits in the wings
And they began to “revive” him
I’m waiting for it to be upgraded as a free 3M analog.
1 Like
Panzer IIIj 1 and IIIL i love alot in warthunder
1 Like
Ah! J1 is br2!
It should be the go to tank for axis in br2, that one is really decent.
But requires aiming, unlike the stuff it faces 
1 Like
Turan 1 would be sweet
5 Likes
the hell is that?
But yes it looks funny
1 Like
Hungarian. Gun is small but rapid fire, really fun tank. Reeeeeeally mobile
Can reverse as fast as it goes forward (43km/h)
2 Likes
I’ll even say more, if you aim, you can kill tanks of the 5 BR head-on. Including the IS-2 44 and the entire family of Shermans and Pershngs.
The Panzer IV E and F1 are very good BR2 tanks, and they were even before the merge. In Moscow, nobody uses the Panzer IV F2. Everyone is using the Panzer IV with the 75mm L/24 gun, which is also much better than the T-28E, mainly due to its superior mobility. The only issue right now is that new players lack squads.
1 Like
Based on my experience, the Panzer III M is overly OP at BR2. It’s even strong at BR3—its frontal armor can withstand a 76mm main gun, and I often use it to destroy KV tanks. The KV’s 76mm L/11 gun poses no threat to its front. Therefore, I don’t recommend including this tank in the tech tree, as once its numbers become widespread, it will cause serious balance issues.
3 Likes
My brother in Christ, we have the Panzer III J1 and the 50mm Kwk 39 gun has 106mm of armor pen similar to the Crusader’s six pounder gun. That shit is pretty good, I haven’t used the Panzer III N in years now. Personally I do not support the BR change since it is illogical and sets a bad precedent but the fact of the matter remains is that there always have been better alternatives.
2 Likes
Starting to see this get chucked around a lot as a major reason “Superior Mobility”. Which given the amount of people that don’t seem to know good the T-28 is, made me think perhaps people hadn’t tried it and are just parroting what they have heard.
It Didn’t match my experience…soooo I gave it a quick comparison.
I don’t mind balancing or trying out BR changing. I do mind it if its based on rumor and repeating unfounded statements. (Not to say this is their main reason for changing…Just diffusing the superior mobility/speed one)
The main difference IS IIIN has better reload speed and turret weak spot, T-28 has extra crew/MGs, Better APHE rounds and Hull weak spot.
5 Likes
THANK YOU.
Glad to see other ppl gets it.
3 Likes
I know
Under the circumstances, you can turn the mountain down)
More than once it was that the weaker car took the opponent stronger.if the tank couldn’t cope, he tried to finish off the Crew that Survived.
I remember my raids into the gray zone after tigers and panthers.
If desired, you can do anything.
But when there is no desire, problems arise.
Personally, I don’t care what they raise or lower. I’m ready for everything
But sometimes you get really creepy offers from people who play this game.
1 Like
If you aren’t putting your armor in an angle, you will still get one hit killed by KV1 - but in BR2 you are very OP.
I honestly don’t understand the shaking. Pz F1 is the same 3n but without the 80mm frontal. But yes, it should be given heat but not a full ammo load.
3 Likes
If the anti-aircraft guns had armor-piercing shells, this tank would die very often.
His ammunition is weak still, a little is HE necessary Still