BR 3 ️⬅️ Return BF110 G-2 (I changed my mind...This change was 1 sided...heres why)

Suggestions
1

image

At first, I wasn’t too bothered about the BF110 G-2 being put up to BR 4 Because I’m always flying something different anyway.

it is a decently effective plane…and the best Attacker Axis has because everything else after it is either broken or not effective.

But I have changed my mind!

The reason for The BF110 G-2 being moved up was FAR too thin and not Just.

This plane simply cannot be up tiered Because “its rockets are strong”, While planes like the IL 2 1941 (BR2), IL 2-M Type 3 (BR 3), and P-38G (BR-2) roam free (I Would add mustang to this list for how strong it is, but it doesn’t have rockets, and that was the primary reason stated)

BR 3 is Mid game! Powerful stuff is more than acceptable here!!! (And rampant) the gloves are off… The counterparts to the BF110 G-2 are still HERE (or even lower at BR 2). This plane isn’t even in Reach of blowing up BR 1…Two of the other rocket planes mentioned are…

I Challenge this change on the grounds it was a 1-sided change and would see it reverted.

Take a look at this clip and tell me honestly that these planes aren’t every bit the BF110s Match…

Those same rockets I used to annihilate the team in the clip…are available on the I-153 at BR 1!!!

@Euthymia07-live I wonder If I could ask you opinion. If you would humor me enough to watch the clip and see the destruction. What are your thoughts on this if I may?

Having said that, I’m not advocating to see these planes moved up Aswell because they are so much fun and I enjoy them…

But in All fairness, these planes do the same thing. AND MUST BE TREATED AS SUCH.

Id really like to know where this change originated from.

IMO BF110 G-2 should be returned.

…I’m sure debate is about to follow…(EDIT aparantly not…I think people know this changes was unwarranted considering what other planes exist)

31 Likes
2

I’d love for these type of things to happen but considering they crippled the AA guns in the past for an event that happened quite some time ago I would say everything developers do is intentional.

3

That video was great, Stalin’s power!
elmo-sovjet

And about the BF110 G2 modification I was against it from the beginning, the same about that American fighter, planes without bombs are very useless against tanks.

3 Likes
4

Said it since the beginning.

Counterparts are all br3.

So… no reason for this to be 1 br higher.

7 Likes
5

It’s currently Germany’s best BR4 attacker plane.

Until Ju188 is back at BR4, I don’t see any reason why should G2 be brought back to BR3.

1 Like
6

The reasons are all listed in the main post.

Should IL2s be br4 because they are the best Soviets attackers before the Tu?

8 Likes
7

This is suggestion not about IL2. I don’t like “this faction has some overperforming thing, so this faction deserves to have it as well” arguments.

G2 is perfectly fine where it is.

The discussion of whether BR2 is the right BR for IL2 is for a whole other debate, I think. It is not point of this suggestion.

2 Likes
8

Well there aint much competition there for it in BR 4.
So it beeing the best there doesnt mean much.

3 Likes
9

Oh, but it is exactly about it.

Battle rating should not discriminate between factions. It should be impartial.

Right now, the G2 counterparts from other factions are all in br3.

So yes, logically g2 should be br3 as well.

What has no relevance with the current suggestion is Ju’s br.

5 Likes
10

But thats exactly how things should be.

11

I agree it should be moved back to br3.

3 Likes
12

Because everything after it is broken or underwhelming.

4 Likes
13

I believe it should be exactly the opposite. If one specific weapon/vehicle is overperforming.

Something about it should change. It should either get nerf, increase of BR, or increase of BR with buff.

But I don’t think we should be pushing for new whole meta based on one overperforming weapon/vehicle. (Exactly what happened to BR2 recently, totally killing the vibe this BR used to have. Great shame).

Well, currently aircraft balance is completely all over the place. With nothing really being coherent or consistent. Not mention all these planes do have significant differences between each other. And you can’t simply say they’re 1:1 counterparts.

I just don’t see any reason to lower currently best German BR4 attacker before it gets proper replacement. I just don’t.

It’s not like Germen BR3 is in need of good attacker. All current BR3 BF 110s are very decent.

14

The soviets and allies both have attacker aircraft with rockets at br3.
Why does germany need two at br4?
Reason enough?

1 Like
15

Sure, if they actually did something.
But as we’re yet again about to celebrate the annual broken ppsh stick for example we can fairly confidentally conclude that yet again they aint doing shit about it.
So obviously, add something equally broken to others, either that accelerates the fixes or everyone enjoys equally.

2 Likes
16

The rockets mind you are excellent at killing tanks and for some reason i find easier to use than the A8 because of its speed

17

No. Because the A8 going to 3 was something they and people like you could use as a reason why we don’t need 110 g2, sure it does very well at its job but does not belong in BRIV.

Starter plane in normandy too… they made another god damn t-34-85 situation (which i’m 95% sure why they are so bad because noobs in high br and not even with the other noobs at low creating bad games all around). Well done.

18

Well
A-20 have rocket of 12 * 2 kg tnt
BF110 have rocket of 4 * 9.5 kg tnt + cannons
fair enough

19

People like me?
Please explain.

20

That hardly matters when you have a quantity that allows you to saturate an entire area

A-20

1749412801372709127420661242316
17494128013727091274206612423162000×1100 622 KB

If you watched the clip, even the soviet rockets are devasting, while also having bombs and 23mm cannons that shred tanks

In that clip alone several of those runs take out both tanks at once.

2 Likes