Body Armour should be purely cosmetic, remove the 10% damage reduction from it

Suggestions
124

Im not biased to any faction. I play them all, now, stay on topic about body armour damage reduction and how silly it is.

5 Likes
125

I fully agree with you as a Soviet main the game needs to be balanced for all

126

I agree, they are more common on BR5, but my second guess is still correct, only 1 in 1000 will be able to put up a good fight. Having cuirasses does not help other players win.

127

Then OP king tiger and FG42 don’t matter either as only 1 in 100 players can put up a fight.

7 Likes
128

As far as I remember, the Uragan submachine gun in the game has an incorrect rate of fire. In all the sources I found, its rate of fire is listed as around 600 rounds per minute. So maybe it’s worth lowering the Uragan’s rate of fire, but giving it more damage. What do you think about that?

129

Then why are you reds so adamant in keeping a seemingly “useless” advantage if it does nothing much?

7 Likes
130

I don’t believe you. Many factions have a unique advantage, but you’re only talking about the USSR. I don’t think that’s fair.

131

Let me answer your question with a question, why are you so averse if it doesn’t do anything?

132

That is your problem then, this discussion is about soviet body armour, not other factions.

Also:

image
image1092×290 108 KB

7 Likes
133

Let me answer you by pointing you to the very detailed original post @EVA_Evo just made.

Reasons are all there.

5 Likes
134

post scriptum. In the end, it is you who must prove your point to the developer. And the idea that “if it doesn’t work, let’s remove it” is not suitable, since the developer will have to work to remove it. Remove what can be left untouched, you yourself say so.

135

in that case, the cuirasses will remain, for a little while longer.

136

Except everyone agrees it works. Even you

So begone troll

5 Likes
137

and I have already answered you about this, and you are answering this. The answer was for you personally, but this is my point of view. Cuirasses are very rare and do not affect the fight to a sufficient degree.

138

Too many people on here that just want to argue about stuff instead of staying on topic in any single thread. Its disgusting

2 Likes
139

No, it’s wednesday :stuck_out_tongue:

Also king tiger OP

1 Like
140

An advantage is an advantage, but we are arguing about the magnitude of this advantage, aren’t we? My opinion is that the advantage of cuirasses is negligible.

141

I’m not discussing this with you for the 1000th time. Get lost troll

142

Good.

My opinion is that it’s advantage is significant.

143

I can’t say. I, like many others, did not ask for or expect this submachine gun. There are a lot of things wrong with the game, especially the Japanese weapons.