Everybody talking about what will be next after pacific. But campaign system is still a problem. If they add 50 major battlegrounds from ww2 this makes 50 campaigns. Grind will be astronomical. They need to switch WT progress tree system and merge campaigns to theatres
Well, I’m partial neutral about it.
Some are okey with it, others are against,
The main issue would rise though, ( at least for me )
What would be the criteria?
In my chase, I have almost maxed out Berlin, and Normandy Stalingrad. Yet, in no near good levels with Tunisia and Moscow.
Ideally, the tech tree would start from starter equipment to end up with latter gear ( such as Normandy, Berlin, pacific etc.
But what would happen for those who are towards the mid, or end?
Like, have fully Tunisia unlocked, same for Normandy, or Berlin etc.
Would those people be locked from the gear before they will be able to use them? Because they would have to go through all year equipment like war thunder?
Would they be unable to progress because they haven’t unlocked previous campaign?
Because as I have played war thunder, that’s what I found my self mostly with unless I managed to reach the era that I wanted managing to avoid the recent tank being added in the line.
And that’s what I mostly dislike about wt. in enlisted I have choice.
Not to end up with a clusterfuck of arcady bs seeing tigers in stalingrad… or t34s in Tunisia.
I think it’s bad deal to lose the premise of enlisted to turn it into something else.
But that’s just me I guess.
Well, I can only offer my old idea again.
How the feck are people already speculating on the next campaign when Pacific didn’t even come out?
Look at the posts in forum dude