At first i thought this game was a alpha. Then i saw it was Russian. This explains a lot, it is not like anything remotely finished ever comes from there. And here is what is wrong (and thus they need to improve to even make a chance of this game ever getting populair.)
The graphical quality is poor.
The controles feel like its from the year 2000.
You play as a squad with the dumbest AI ever, but somehow they can see you behind bushes and everything.
You think you are playing with a lot of ppl, but really it is 5vs5 half the time and you just have to shoo the same guy over and over again so he wont take controle of a other character.
Guns controle very sticky
It is a game FULL of loot boxes. Everything is a random reward you can buy. NO ONE likes loot boxes.
You need to switch to the main menu just to play a different map? Why not just have the 3 armies to select from and then the maps. This is just more clicking and useless navigation.
Got a new character? Good, now this is how he will look for ever
Character got a perk? Not the one you need? To bad, guess you better buy a new character with IRL money and hope he will level with good stats
You canât switch to a weapon while running.
Thrown a grenade? Well, better stop moving and switch weapons standing still. Or you will be standing with your dick in your hand the sec a enemy shows up. Making you a sitting duck.
This isnât even playable yet atm. Let alone ask money for it. So much more work to do on it.
TL:DR
This is how it would be if a army was run by a pigeon and the soldiers where all mentally retarded. (like move and switch weapons or so was to much to prosses and they needed to stand still and think about it a min). And the logistics where run by the gambling committee.
Switching weapons, and getting grenades out should take time, this is Battlefield without all the stupid stuff like getting a grenade out while sprinting ect.
No, you need to switch campain to play different campain, not map.
And campains/nations canât be combined because game is advertised as historically acurete, so things like Stg44 in moscow are out of question.
You may argue that game isnât historically accurate anyway but in my opinion itâs accurate when compared to games like CoD or BF.
I wouldnât call it poor at all, still better than battlefield which you are loving to site so much.
You must have never played a game in 2000.
The AI isnât that bad. Definitely seen games with a lot worse although they still need lots of work. They canât see behind bushes unless theres some gap in them.
Its like a 12 v 12 typically. The game is literally advertised as being built around squad combat with bot squadmates.
What?
Itâs not all random, and how else would you aquire weapons in a ftp?
What? You literally just click switch campaign and select the new campaign you want to play. This literally takes a few seconds.
This one is currently true, weâll see if that changes
Or you can literally reroll it. How long have you played this game? A single match?
Whats wrong with this? A person cant swap to a weapon off their sling mid sprint either. Thatâs the mechanic they chose to go with.
What are you saying? Are you complaining about grenade blast radius or complaining that you cant shoot while holding a grenade? This isnât Call of Duty.
Thats your opinion. And based off your reasoning that you stated above it doesnât seem like you ever gave the game a chance. Your loss mate.
When i do it IRL, the gdm things donât take as long as they do in the game. Not only that, but there on the belt in in WW2. There pretty damn fast to throw.
Same with a weapon switch. The rifle is around the body with a sling. This is so you can switch pretty fast. Even if you are not trained in it it takes only a sec or 2. No yes, this is only for rifle to knife or pistol. Not to a rocket launcher for ex. But are you really telling me you donât think you can grab the rifle on your shoulder again while running? Because you can really ez.
Yhea, so that is a different map. You should be able to go to any map the axis can play at once axis is selected for ex. Not talking like Russians on Normandy. But no matter what army you play, you want to be able to switch armies fast to play the other maps. Not go back to the main menu to select campaign again, to select the same army again but a different map.
Man you came here from COD type of game. COD and this game is like an arcade racing game and a simulator racing. COD does not give you a real feel it only gives you a freaking speed which is unrealistic, yeah this game have few things to be done to movements, but not in large scale. Dont comapre this game to generic fps it at least has a potential
I wouldnât call it poor at all, still better than battlefield which you are loving to site so much.> Blockquote
I donât like Battlefield, but they just have it look waay better then this. THen again, you might be playing on a console, and there the graphics are worse, i know. But still, if you canât see the bad graphics in this game, then you should just play a game and go look at some stuff and not fight. They do look pretty old and pointy.
You must have never played a game in 2000.> Blockquote
35, i have played the game before there even was 3D. And i was even being nice with saying there like back in 2000.
The AI isnât that bad. Definitely seen games with a lot worse although they still need lots of work. They canât see behind bushes unless theres some gap in them.> Blockquote
Yes there are games with worse. But not to many. The gap can be near invisible to players, not to AI it seems.
Its like a 12 v 12 typically. The game is literally advertised as being built around squad combat with bot squadmates.> Blockquote
I know, and it is a crap concept. Half the time you fight bots, might aswell make it a SP game then.
What?> Blockquote
What? The guns controle like you have wooden arms. Itâs like there sticking to you rather then you holding one.
Itâs not all random, and how else would you aquire weapons in a ftp?> Blockquote
I have yet to see a not random item. There is always a random aspect to it. But yes if it remains FTP then i agree. But giving you extra soldiers with no weapons. Thatâs just pushing it way to hard.
What? You literally just click switch campaign and select the new campaign you want to play. This literally takes a few seconds.> Blockquote
And that is bad design. Any app or programm needs to be designd that you should get where you need to be in as few clickes as possible. As i mentioned in a other comment. This is just a step that has no use. Play russians, US or axis should be 1 click (click army), not 3. (click to main menu, click to campaing, click army)
Whats wrong with this? A person cant swap to a weapon off their sling mid sprint either. Thatâs the mechanic they chose to go with.> Blockquote
Umm yes you can. Do (or did now with corona) it all the time while airsofting (and no there not light weight replicas). Run throw weapon to back, grab knife or pistol. No problem. Grab rifle back, yes it isenât done in a sec. but you can do it relatively fast. And if nothing else, you do it when you stand still if you donât have a weapon in hand. In this game, you donât.
What are you saying? Are you complaining about grenade blast radius or complaining that you cant shoot while holding a grenade? This isnât Call of Duty.> Blockquote
I am saying you should auto get your rifle back out after throwing a grenade. Hardly anyone will put there weapon far away when throwing one. You let go, get a granade (in WW2 on the belt) Throw it. Grab rifle dangling infront of you. Here you just go âok, i threw it. Now what? O right i am in a war, do i need to get my rifle back out?â
Thats your opinion. And based off your reasoning that you stated above it doesnât seem like you ever gave the game a chance. Your loss mate.> Blockquote
Played it a few hourse for a few days now. You must be a real fanboy to not see any problems here.
The bots used to snipe you across the map when the Normandy campaign came out the second time in the cbt and if you donât like it donât play it simple as that best game like this out there with good graphics and great mechanics
I came from âCSGOâ, âARMAâ, and âEscape from Tarkovâ. Iâm not some 12 year old kiddo that plays Fortnight or something. Been gaming since Tetris was a ânewâ titel on the gameboy ;p
You are getting heat, because you came in here very aggressively.
You basically said the core of the game was garbage and unplayable, disparaged Russians, and offered very shallow âways to improveâ which was to say make it more like BF.
Apparently two clicks is too many. Thats actually the BARE MINIMUM YOU CAN DO IT IN.
So you want a completely different game without bots, theres tons out there.
HAHAHAHAHA
Sorry but when running full sprint with a group of people you slow down before drawing a loaded firearm with no safety on it so you donât shoot yourself or your allies.
That indeed does happen.
Called silver orders, you literally get some after a short bit of play. So I can only wonder why I think youâve barely played
Iâve agreed with you in my response on some things. But a lot of what youâve said is blatantly false.
Out of all the possibilities you chose the most fitting prologue to present your opinion. Well done mate, Iâm sure the snail will listen and your feedback will improve the game.
Man itâs a game if you canât have fun or donât like any of the concepts or mechanics of the game donât play it we donât need to hear your 12 year old ramblings about how crappy the game is
Well, saying that Enlisted is a sim game is an overstatement. For me itâs like COD but with bots and trying to be historically accurate. But the core game-play is nonexistent beyond just being COD with bots.
Battlefield isnât even good these days. The maps have progressively shrunk in scale, the vehicles are extremely limited in number, and itâs become more like CoD than Enlisted could ever hope to be.
If Enlisted does anything, it should stay well away from copying anything DICE does these days!
