The FG 42 “buff” was a change no one asked for. It made the FG 42 even worse, and the decision to use the FG 42 II instead even easier. Now you will only see the FG 42 II. They should’ve added a bayonet or made some other meaningful change instead to differentiate the two.
In fact, I would’ve preferred a FG 42 with same fire rate, but with the bayonet instead. AVT and AVS both have bayonets (right, I’m only in BR IV so I’ve only encountered them or picked them up). It would’ve been much more meaningful than increasing RPM to unusable territory.
Oh so we will arguing that it’s not real? Mate if it’s not real then it’s only in your head. Kiraly is inferior weapon that can’t handle shooting for more than 2 secs, dispersion makes it a garbage smg. So where are you stats and counter argument rather than “don’t use it, cuz don’t ok?”. I will keep presenting the data because data is always right and you are wrong.
no it won’t, it always uses data for automatic especially for smg and mg
lmao what a joker. I’m loving destroying you Germans carrying your bulky MG34 with my BAR and always proving you wrong every single match. But anyway thank for your gun i will be using it once i ran out of my rounds in my BAR.
Oh really so when are you going to ban thousands of players? Secondary wepaons were always a game feature, everyone can carry two weapons once you unlock them as your skill. It’s your inability to use what game provides to you.
that’s the point, unfair vs unfair. That’s what players want but shame that it’s only American and Soviet players that want to keep unfair things given to them but when Germans demand a fair same treatment then you see booos. So we either keep it fair and give Germany some new toys + buffs or remove/nerf your guns.
It seems like it was just excuse to give soviets Avt-40 20 that is in my opinion a better weapon than FG42 II. More rof is never better past 750 rpm when it’s paired with worse dispersion and recoil direction.
Wake up, the M39 isn’t that hard to control, and what good stuff does the American BR4 have? The “Jumbo” M4A2 76W? You want me to use these things to defeat Tiger tanks and Panther Gs? And that damn 20-round machine gun—when the Germans were already using 75-round machine guns, the Americans were still stuck with 20-round ones.
yes but its only unfair when you equip the johnson and garand
moving the g43 to br3 would be unfair all the time
unfair if the g41 43 are equipped together
vs garand johnson combo
unfair if the enemy has the g43 and you have the johnson or garand by itself
yes being unfair is standard practice but this is too far
While in reality Garand + johnson combo is stronger than G41+G43 combo as their stats are just superior. You can check it on your own if you don’t believe me. While right now BR3 balance it’s just extra unfair in every single way vs Germany and nobody seem to care.
How many semi-automatic rifles are in your squad? I wouldn’t use a 9-man infantry squad in BR3. A commando squad having 2 semi-automatic rifles is already the maximum, and the BAR and 1928A1 simply can’t defeat the ZK383 and MG34.
Huh? The MG34 can shred an entire squad in 3 seconds—can the BAR do that? The ZK383 has such excellent accuracy, fire rate, and recoil control, yet you insist on using the MP40?
because the bar has to reload two and half time more often
have you heard of burst fire instead of holding down the trigger burr
as for the g43 debate
dispersion is is different by like 5% or less so i di not include it
i dont know reload times but
the johnson is slightly faster the g41
and the garand and g43 are comparable
Yes, because that’s what I’m comfortable with using. I am still able to squad wipe with it, even in BR III against Soviets. I don’t use weapons just because they’re "Meta".
I use weapons because that’s what I’m good with. Clearly, you’re not good with either the BAR or Thompsons, hence why you dump on them. I use the M1A1 instead of the 1928 in BR III, because I find the sights better and I’m able to hit more shots.
Yes, that’s the point I’m getting at. You can burst fire at enemies, which is great at range. But you can’t exactly burst fire in a house. The BAR is much better at pushing objectives and pushing enemies back at the grey zone. Enlisted is an offensive game, not a defensive like many presume.
In fact, the upper limit of the U.S. BR3 is right here—it cannot defeat Germany or even Japan in infantry combat alone and must rely on combined arms coordination between infantry, tanks, and aircraft.
Regarding the MG34, your soldiers will not suffer a movement speed penalty when wielding a pistol or an axe. Simply equip a weapon-switching speed skill to completely negate the 50% movement speed penalty.
Nowhere did I mention a movement speed penalty. Nowhere. What I’m talking about is the ease of wielding. Yes, I can clear a house with it, but if I don’t kill all enemies with the one magazine, I’m toast for 5.5 seconds. The BAR on the other hand, if I run out of ammo, it’s no different to an SMG where I will get a full magazine in less than 2.5 seconds.
