Balanced game indeed

6 Likes

You were here by the winter event, you should know well enough by now how the playerbase shifts.
The fact that you had absolutely no problem with allies dominating for months shows what a hypocrite you are.

3 Likes

lol sure thing.

Just something i observed this weekend.

The game far out paces most casual or new players.

If you watch them, its not that they dont attack. Its just that they do it super slowly, corner peeking, checking buildings, crawling. So slowly, the respawn wave is back before they have achieved anything

The game style is too fast for newbies/casuals

I have been of the opinion for a long time it needs to be slowed down again. (Through the way captures work)

3 Likes

I would recommend them other games
Or let the official add a ranked mode

This kind of balancing issue is nearly impossible to adress if they keep allowing players to chose their own side.
But due to how progression is set up and BR they cant even fix this problem by forcing veteran into each side against their will as people might not have a line up for both sides that would be able to compete.

So in a way the merge ensured these kind of problems to perssist forever as you would need a serious remake of the entire game to be able to fix anything related to that issue.

I don’t know any fps game which would have as low skill ceiling and low learning curve, or in total more noob friendly fps multiplayer than Enlisted.

Perhaps it is the players this game attracts (+35-90y old?)
Or that most of games are filled with bots? I can’t, most of days, really decide if I’m playing against bots or not.

Its so odd…i would expect that age of gamers to be on the ball. (Grew up gaming when it wasnt as easily accessable)

…guess enlisted mainly attracts players playing a game for the first time? Certainly feels that way

Forget it.

We’ve been asking for more balanced games for two years now. Right here, other players have given us some excellent ideas that could alleviate the problem.

I don’t think it gets any better. No player of any kind of online game likes unbalanced games.

New players arrive here and stay for a short time. Which is a real shame, because the game isn’t bad. Very good graphics, great weapon ideas and versatile gameplay.

2 Likes

At one point, a US player complains about the concentration of players in Germany, and at another point, a German player complains about the concentration of players in the US.
Don’t you think it is nonsense for players to complain to each other?
It is not the player’s fault that there is an imbalance in the team; it is the basic design of the game that is at fault.

I have seen many players make suggestions over the last two years about team imbalances, but so far they have not done anything about matchmakers other than introducing BR and don’t seem to have any plans to do anything about it.
In the long run the game might improve a little bit, but, well, I guess it won’t get better anytime soon. :neutral_face:

There was a thread about all the seniors complaining about some wheelchair assist or something being nerfed not so long ago IIRC…
Though your right about the age, 35-40y/o players who’ve gone through the Arena-genre should thrive here. Maybe its the lack of competition?
But dunno, most of players I meet - even those who stack - feel like they’re tad worse than your regular BF4 public player…

But this game really doesn’t attract much of the cream of the crop when it comes to fps players, and one explanation to it is that it is “so easy” that it almost feels like it was made for mentally handicapped people…

which, in fact, explains much.

1 Like

You sir have the thread. Plus, it looks like a typical whine post anyways. Probably shouldn’t have put anything here thinking that way lol.

now you will quit too until the soviets come back and start dominating, and the endless cycle will continue