Doesn’t Germany need to confront Lancaster?
1 Like
It seems that Beretta’s horizontal recoil will be more stable, what’s wrong?
1 Like
These SMG got such a low damage all because of the balance to soviet chest armour .Even Japanese 7.65mm MP34(7.0 in 10m) and 8mm Nambu Type 100(7.2) could have a higher damage than them.The soviet 7.62mm(6.7/6.6) and has a higher muzzle kinetic energy than 9mm or the weakest 8mm Nambu.The soviet chest armour has ruined such a good bullet.
Reducing their ROF to balance their damage is definitely a good choice,but what this game should really rebalance is the chest armour and SMGs in low BR,bcause not all players have enough cards to equip their soldier a chest armour in all maps.
BTW,the damage of PPSH41 drum should be increase to 6.9(the same with PPS(red),the current damage(6.6)makes it really useless in BRV.
It goes up way more than PPS and also horizontal recoil is much worse due visual recoil being of higher value. You ain’t hitting those headshots just by holding left like with PPS-42 you need to actively aim to the left.
I started aiming at the left bottom corner and look how much both guns traveled at the top. PPS-42 only 40% of the horizontal plane while M38/42 absolutely dreadful ~75% of the horizontal plane also traveling much further up way above the aimed target. Both guns shot 35 rounds, M38/42 with 40 rounds wouldn’t even register as you would be shooting at the sky or balloons.
The 7.0 damage can be seen as fake.While fighting out of 10m range,The damage of MP40 is attenuated to the same with 6.8(both 4.0 on 100m).You can see this on MP40(S) 6.8 on 10m,and 3.9 on 100m.
I dont have issues with type hei either but I dont see it relevance.
I believe the histori acuraci argument was trashed while ago with post-war jet ( soviet )
ak 47
And what ever catburgler 9000 the new smg soviets got.
Not a single time against sovjets.
If you feel threatned about lancaster you are free to make your own topic about it.
You damn guy will never see what I said before.A pseudo gentleman who takes things out of context.
I don’t mind if Germany has a submachine gun with an 800 fire rate and 6.8 damage in BR2, but without a bulletproof vest, I would say no.
What I see now is the German main force complaining about bulletproof vests and submachine guns with an 800 firing rate. I have no doubt that I will oppose these greedy guys.
Similarly, I don’t believe that anyone who thinks that Pershing has APCR can fight against Tiger 2 would do anything wise.Or do you want me to post more jokes about German main players? You’d better not provoke for no reason.
I would leave the PPS-42 as it is. It’s almost on par with the Lanchester. For the PPS-43, I would reduce the ROF to 720.
→ then you have the choice between better weapon handling (PPS-42) or faster ROF (PPS-43).
Uragan needs to go up to BR III in it’s current state.
Additionally increase the ROF of the FNAB to 660-680 (fully upgraded), and the nations would be almost on par with BR II SMG.
2 Likes
You guys are not calculating down state HP.
A soldier has 10 HP and 10 more HP in downed state.
The 10 “normal” HP can be increased via vitality to 13.5 HP. (Does not apply to downed state HP).
But downed state may be skipped by dealing damage much higher than “normal” HP.
So the damage of AVS36 is completely meaningless, and the faster firing rate of FG422 will give it a greater advantage, right?
Since you don’t want to admit it, don’t make such almost meaningless arguments.
Being able to knock down the enemy is undoubtedly an advantage, and the threat of the enemy will be reduced as a result.
1 Like
not even close, lanchester is highly inaccurate while pps-42 is extremely accurate and is very close to mp40
The Lanchester is LITERALLY more accurate than the PPS-42.
Read the stats sheet.
Pps-42 makes up with much less recoil, while Lanchester has 1.5x times more recoil than Pps-42.
Sorry but Pps-42 has always been a better SMG than Lanchester.
1 Like
lanchester is still far away from being “inaccurate”
AVS-36 has 15.8 damage while FG42 has 15.3 damage.
0.5 damage difference is… I have no data. No one has data how much difference 0.5 more damage makes.
We do know that more damage increases the chance to skip downed state, but how much AVS-36 wins by that damage difference is unknown.
Im guessing that it’s supposed to be significant since we also see a 0.5+ damage with MP35/I compared to other 9mm SMGs but I cannot prove this by anyway.
Kinda just there to ensure body armor would be useless should everyone get them at some point.
Cap and its not even close
0.196s ttk vs 0.112s of the Lanchester
And don’t try to act like the Lanchester is some uncontrollable beast, these SMGs have functionally 0 recoil
Yes, people have the data
Top is 15.8, bottom is 15.3
Chance to outright kill instead of downing
Vit is just a soldier with Vitality - 13.5 HP
Vit+ is Vitality + The down chance perk
Its about 2.5% more likely to instakill people
People have the data.
1 Like
did you include downed state in that?
Doesnt seem like you did, you dont just down someone, you finish him off as well which takes two more bullets from Lanchester thus doubling its actual TTK compared to time to down.