then use the rockets of first plane.
how many people cried about Ppsh and Avs and fedorov being meta shit ? Nothing was done ⌠now some ruskie complaints and suddenly AvS should be fixed immediatly ⌠you cant expect much sympathy
1 Like
They are used to.
it should be like this , but it isnt , this man is living in alternate reality
1 Like
Bur axis have FG vs Fedorov
And kiraly+sniper MKb vs AVS
There was metashit vs metashit
now it is meta geramn shit VS not meta soviet shit (under moscow, in other campain all in normal)((but i thins germany it stalinrad a little bit weaker thar soviet, but it is the most balanced campain in my opinion))
Dis you know that the PZIIIJ/1 is nerfed in enlisted so it doesnt pen T50?
In WT you can go clean through upwards of 700m
Here you have a yellow marker meaning probably will not at 50m
Cool and normal!!!
2 Likes
Could be a difference in rounds fired
yes and avs is nerfed 
1 Like
They both fire the same APC as in War thunder
Hes acting like AVS is the only thing keeping moscow allies going.
Its the rest of the stuff, because honestly everything they have is better.
2 Likes
kiraly was added only lately and its too high on level for newbie imo , and recoil was too much initially ( which i was okay with that) until then all soviet side did was enjoying total BOT utopia where axis players diminished FROM MOSCOW, with ppsh ruling all needed distances, you are OK that ONE smg is general purpose machine gun ? in moscow campaign PPSH-41 was only beginning to appear here in enlisted its everywhere
people generally agree that all soviet weaponry in moscow is suspiciously very capable of fighting against axis ones on early levels, i know its a game but ⌠if mkb was unreliable , then it should have its imperfections showed in gameplay itself âŚ
if ppsh drum was mostly unreliable then it should be shown ingame, along with tower feed drum PPD 34 that jammed as hell and overheated as all PPd, if AVS was crap to shoot in full auto, it should be showned in game ⌠and it was, only in burst fire it was somehow fine
There was a time before the big shotgun nerf, where such statement hold weight, now days after the BS massive dispersion and other stuff stuff like the semi automatic rifle Random super slow fire limit, the game canât claim that.
If we talk about gun handling and realism, then the game used to be better before. And what we got right now with useless shotguns, bullets that leave the gun barrel at 45 degree angle, where the weapon muzzle position doesnât matter and there is no way to reliably aim accurately at a 100m with weapons that can easily hit their targets at 200m. And while so far this Havenât made me stop playing, it has definitely made me less interested in. The gane, do I tend to not it play very much this days.
Yeah he no, the ppsh is stupid reliable in real life,the issue was getting a mag set from the right factory, as the soviets fucked up in the production line as standards in between factories where a bit different causing issues with the feeding mechanism if the mag didnât fit the gun well enough. But such issue was fixed with the introduction of stick mags, which where far more interchangeable in between guns of different factories.
The AVS for the other side, got removed from service because of itâs tendency to jam in battlefield conditions, as it wasnât good enough at preventing mud and dirt from entering in the mechanism.
1 Like
True and it was rather genious gun, so simple that people who thought the outhouse will be the peak of engineering for next 2000 years could assemble it.
Disregarding trigger assembly, if I recall it had only 1 screw. Other than that it was rivetted and hammered together.
Accuracy ? Well the sights of usual ppsh was pretty much decoration.
That dont really matter, when you have 10 ? 100 ? 1000 ? PPShâs firing at same place the accuracy is the least of the problems.
But ingame the gun is just as accurated as any highly engineered & manufactured smg in the game.
Which is why ppshâs left from factory with 1-2 mags which were selected for the said gun.
Later perhaps with 3.
Well yeah, Enlisted maps arenât the largest, so it seems like they toned down overall accuracy of all weapons to compensate, because some weapons, like the Grease Gun / MP3008, aka some of the most inaccurate weapons, were only effective up to 91m / 100m, and itâs shown pretty well how bad they are at range, while weapons like the M1 Garand were effective up to ~270m, and bolt actions like the Lee Enfield and Mosin Nagant being effective up to ~500m, which I believe is translated pretty well into smaller sizes as those weapons ARE the better guns for range in Enlisted.
Russian pride, We Russians will never forget our national pride. thatâs why we will never side with axis in this game. and the ones who do are sent to siberia.
6 Likes
Brainwashed
1 Like
You can find people hitting targets with it at 100m reliably, and with a maximun effective range of 200m you can also hit targets at such distance without much of an issue, other than skill issues of course, also if both bullets are of the same quality grade 7.62x25 TT is more accurate than 9x19mm
while this is good as for a PPSH-41 performance demonstration, I would take the MP-40 performance with a grane of salt, as accurate shots with it are still quite doable.
Good luck finding accurated ppsh made during 1941-1945.
Your video is rather good example, 1956.
1 Like