I am just asking for a friend.
For update butthurt, the skillful distance is fight them at 10m with a BA in meantine they spam a ppsh41, the nooby distance alway for them is upper the 50m because for them is already grey zone
Its frustrating to see this salt. At some point I think CoD and Battlefield degenerated the whole WW2 genre.
Itâs annoying Itâs true. For once, Devs brought up a truly great update favouring everyone.
And here of course we have high lvl power creeps whining they cannot stomp new players as easily with their sf riflesâŚ
The answer to both your questions is yes.
To be honest, greyzone camping is still gay. But thatâs the problem of gray zones.
full auto at 0 to 1 meter only
iron sight at around 2 km away
maximal immersion
HmâŚ
Now I get this CQC-fettish
no NOIFE!
full auto, full belt to kill a single soldier with mg42 / 75 round or US 100 round one or no fun.
and for maximal immersion, screaming âYEAAAAAAA GET SOMEâ
also,
THATS RIGHT
UNIT
FOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAARD!
Itâs funny because most actual WWII combat was mostly beyond 100m though these COD kids think that you should always be within 10m so they can mindlessly slaughter bots.
Just out of curiosity how is it any different to slay same bots at 100m ?
Slowly killing bots at range is different than slaughtering bot squads sitting on the objective.
So from safety of 100m killing bot squads is better than killing them fast in cqc ?
Iâm not saying itâs âbetterâ just killing bots at range require you to aim and must reload after 5 shots. While. SMG on point can whipe AI way easier without actually needing to aim.
And while doing that aiming from safety of 100m you have plenty of time, infact you can get groceries, wash car and perhaps read a book before you take your skilled shot.
Its quite mandatory unless you have ppsh and you dont have 5mins of time to take your aim.
Well in my opinion most SMGs are perfectly fine, but as you said PPSh is different and honestly that is the only non skillful SMG in the game
While most combats were at more than 100m accordingly to researches by the American military post war, most casualties happen at 20-80m, that was one of the strongest reason on how they developed weapons during the rest of the 20th century until modern war made it change again but thatâs another subject.
At this point I wouldnât be against a gamemode without objectives beyond killing enemies, the amount of campers is pretty noticeable so why not give us a big open map to change some 100-200m combats. I guess I can only dream with a really immersive WW2 combat experience instead of this sorry excuse for a immersive game with CQC objectives but that rewards camping.
i recommend the art of war by sun tzu.
x)))
Most casualties came from artillery. Is artillery calldownâs now the gentlemanâs way to play Enlisted?