AT guns and glass ball incendiaries on sapper construction after major mechanics update

Suggestions
1

Please ensure that the developers have taken into account the new mechanism for rationalising the construction of engineer regiments with anti-tank guns that would have varied from campaign to campaign, I don’t want to see the Soviet and German armies having to deal with King Tigers and is-2 with small calibre 50±mm anti-tank guns.
There are also concerns about the misuse of the glass ball incendiary firing positions. Hopefully the devs will take this into full consideration.
@1942786

7 Likes
2

I’m sure this is also something else the devs never considered, just pissin in the wind

6 Likes
3

I’ve just completed my 10 anti-tank guns kill for the week task and due to the need to do this I dropped out of 2 games midway through and scored 2 defeats and 1 win in the other 3. A combination of factors is frustrating me

4

You allready deal with Pak38 vs Jumbo … difference ?

6

I want them to be prepared, not ignored. Including the Soviet 53k(45mm)

7

so you want to say that you want devs to fix problem that is already present ingame?

8

Potentially more serious problems after the new mechanism update

9

On the bright side this is also an opportunity to add a lot more variety of Engineer constructs

10

hope so

11

In the so-called new BR-MM

You can imagine grenade and molotov cocktail fights at low levels, and white phosphorus molotov cocktails and molotov cocktails and flamethrower fights at all levels, and then players would post the same cry in the forums, asking the dev team to nerf those things into marshmallows

1 Like
12

I thought Normandy and Berlin already have the stronger PAK40 isntead of the PAK38. But yes:
Bigger tanks need bigger AT guns for sure.

13

Berlin has Pak 40, but Normandy only has Pak 38.

2 Likes
14

So when do we get the pak 88? :smiley:

15

Imo with new TT, or at least Flak 36.

16

Very good point! I can see the reply, well we won’t see this happen because the BR rating will stop… Er wait a minute guys… Lol :joy:

1 Like
17

Pak38 doesnt even pen the mg port of the jumbo what are you talking about

18

I kind of agree tho I disagree, if we can deal with jumbos with the building of the engeenier whats the use of the AT soldier then? also there are already many (explosive pack over and over, and bombs) ways to deal with tanks, I dont think we need more