Do you guys prefer AT Gunner I or II?
Let’s say we ignore the price.
I’ve seen people hate on AT Gunner II because of the perk that makes it so you throw grenades further, because you are used to the normal grenade arc. However, AT Gunner II has more perk points if you get a perfect soldier.
Additionally, different grenades have different velocities you throw at, so it is inevitable that the arc you throw at will vary.
These are just my thoughts. Which AT Gunner do you guys prefer?
And in addition, which tanker do you guys prefer?
Probably II, but I still got my original I cause I can. Lol. Good ol Fred Cook
Well, imo, it’s obvious the AT Gunner II is better. The extra throwing range of genades perk doesn’t matter since the AT Gunner is equipped with anti-tank weaponry that isn’t affected by the perk. If you’re willing to grind the squad out (a pain in the ass) it’s worth the extra couple perk points that improve survivabilty.
personally, i prefer tier I because of the starter perk.
it’s always life saving being able to cover your self to reload your at gun behind rubbles or what have you.
on the other hand, tier II gets more mobility points, which are great if you want to move around faster.
it really depends from what you are planning to do with them, and where you use them ( low br or high br )
personally, i find best tier I for lower br since you’ll be reloading alot or having a slower time between each shots ( be it a piat, or sturmpistole /grb 39 etc )
and use tier II on latter brs because of panzerfausts, or m9 rockets.
so be quick, easier to reload, and jump on buildings and what not.
Tanker III to be drivers,
Tanker II to be gunners
and tanker I to be commanders/loaders and various replacements
( if the rng doesn’t screw their optimal points )