TLDR
There is no BR5 at gun because I think BR4 should have the best at gun to counter BR 5 tank.
Philosophy of design
- AT gun should be as powerful or more powerful than the tank gun of the same br.
- Preferably, AT gun should have a gun shield, can be move and have limited horizontal traverse. But it can be compromise if there is no better choice.
- The main attribute of deciding the br should be the anti tank capability, i.e. penetration and post pen effect.
BR1
AT gun with 70 mm + penetration.
Germany
3.7 cm Pak36 (Already in editor for a long time)
US
37 mm gun M3
USSR
45 mm anti-tank gun M1937 (53-K) (Already in game)
Japan
Type 1 47 mm anti-tank gun (Already in game)
BR2
AT gun with about 100 mm penetration.
Germany
5 cm Pak 38 (Already in game)
US
57 mm Gun M1/ Ordnance QF 6-pounder (Already in game)
According to the Enlisted resource sheet, the 57mm M1 in game has 101mm penetration, so means it is actually a 43 calibres 6pdr.
USSR
76 mm divisional gun M1942 (ZiS-3)
Japan
Type 90 75 mm field gun
BR3
AT gun with 140 mm+ penetration.
Germany
7.5 cm Pak 40 (Already in game)
US
3-inch gun M5
USSR
57 mm anti-tank gun M1943 (ZiS-2)
Japan
Lightweight Type I Model II (75 mm)
The gun which the new Na To tank destroyer used. I can’t really find any towed Japanese at gun with similar performance and this is the closest stuff I can find.
BR4
AT gun with 200 mm+ penetration.
Germany
8.8 cm Pak 43
US
105 mm gun T8
USSR
100 mm field gun M1944 (BS-3)
Japan
Experimental High-Power 10 cm Cannon 試製大威力十糎加農
I can’t find much information about this gun. The only thing I know is it has muzzle velocity of 900m/s.
If the data of that gun can’t be found, here is the alternative solution.
105 mm Experimental High Velocity cannon (Ho Ri prototype main gun)
