this is one squad without an armor-piercer, available only to those who participated in the old event or poured a lot of silver into the veteran’s boxes, the second is literally a paid squad with the inability to carry full ammunition, and the third is the same as the first but still with basic ammunition and do not tell me that the paratroopers have an advantage in landing, I would he said that on the contrary, in some cases it is a disadvantage because in order to take on armor-piercer or engineers for them, it is necessary to land, and this is longer and more dangerous than just appearing at the point
And these are still 6-man squads, not 9, and the inaccuracy of the fg 42 is clearly exaggerated by you, at least you still don’t deny its firepower in a 9-man squad.
your statement about the disadvantage of the Shpagin submachine gun contradicts the statement that LAD is an excellent weapon, it is worse both in accuracy and rate of fire than Shpagin, and I would call the rate of fire of the Shpagin submachine gun ideal to have a sufficiently long time of continuous firing and fire density, the PPSh 41 has a higher density, but this is a minus because it has already died The opponents eat at least 1-2 bullets before the turn reaches the next opponent.
Did I say something about 5BR bolts? I didn’t say that.
I didn’t confirm this, I just noticed that compared to the PPSh 41, the Shpagin is much better, and that it would be more correct to say that the Shpagin submachine gun is the best smg, and not the PPSh 41. In my opinion, it is generally inferior to its version with a 3-its combat rating, at least it has accuracy, and the ppsh literally A bullet sprayer, there’s no question of accuracy.
and you know what’s even stronger, I’m a good player with 9-man German units from FG 42 2, the only reason not to use such a set is boredom, but otherwise with such a set you can defend and attack equally effectively.
of course, all tanks are easily killed by fausts, you also tell me that the vulnerable areas of the t34 100 and Tiger 2 are the same in a duel with each other(Sarcasm), and the claims about the superiority of the su-9 over the Me262 are not clear to me at all, superior in what? A more powerful cannon? Well, is she alone, maneuverability? well, yes… the Me262 turns in 28 seconds, and the Su-9 in 29. According to the War Thunder cards, this is not a big enough gap to consider the Su-9 weaker than the Me262, which means that it is weaker? I do not know, in terms of ammunition, there are also not unambiguously 200 shells for two 23mm guns and 40 for a 37mm gun for the su-9 and only 360 shells for four 30mm guns for the Me262, I think that talking about the superiority of the firepower of the su-9 compared to the Me262 will also be false. Well, it’s hard for me to estimate the speed, the cards indicate the maximum speed at some height, but I have no idea at what, but so far all the characteristics are +- equal