Apparently the Japanese OI Super heavy was real

Yes, the O-I super-heavy tank was a real, experimental tank project in Japan: [1, 2]

  • Weight: The O-I was a prototype tank that weighed over 120 tons and required a crew of 11. [1, 2]
  • Turrets: The O-I had four turrets. [2]
  • Development: The O-I project was canceled before the prototype was finished. [1]
  • Display: A track from the O-I project is on display at the JGSDF Fuji School in Japan. [1]
  • Variants: The O-I had variants, including the Type 5 Heavy and the Type 4 Heavy. The Type 5 Heavy was intended for coastal defense and breaking through enemy lines. The Type 4 Heavy variant of the O-I was also designed for coastal defense and breaking through enemy lines. [3, 4]

Japan built and tested many multi-turreted heavy tanks between 1925 and 1938, but their armor was too thin and their armaments were inadequate. [5]

[1] O-I super-heavy tank - Wikipedia

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_tanks_of_World_War_II

[3] https://worldoftanks.eu/en/tankopedia/3937-J20_Type_2605/

[4] https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/Tank:J25_Type_4

[5] SENSHA: O-I Superheavy Tank: A Complete History

I wouldn’t mind Japan getting this in their tank lineup. would give Japan a proper heavy tank to compete against the Americans. what Japan needs is a heavy tank.




IJA_interior_side_view_schematic_of_the_O-I_super_heavy_tank

13 Likes

man even in a museum they have pieces of that thing lol

Oh we know its real, the issue is there is some variation in the specifications of it, ranging from armour thickness to even the guns used in all the turrets. I would still support it in game as its actually a far more historical option than the Ho Ri somehow.

As far as I’m aware it was also tested, or well the hull was at least. Putting it about on par with the Maus in HA, or well a bit less than that.

2 Likes

from what I’ve suspected, the guns in the 2 frontal hull turrets are 47mm guns, the same as on the lighter tanks the Japanese have like the Che-He. and the gun in the main turret is a 15 Cm howitzer. and turret on the back is a machine gun

Japs need all the armor they can get. American got some sirius Pershing now.

+1

5 Likes

they need upgraded AT guns aswell

4 Likes

Don’t worry the British 17 pounder AT guns that were added ~3 months ago are just a “temporary” placeholder

1 Like

Variants: The O-I had variants, including the Type 5 Heavy and the Type 4 Heavy. The Type 5 Heavy was intended for coastal defense and breaking through enemy lines. The Type 4 Heavy variant of the O-I was also designed for coastal defense and breaking through enemy lines
-Fake tank variant created by Wargaming(WOT).please forget it.

1 Like

Ho Ri simply doesn’t look like a WW2 vehicle - its very close looking to some cold war TDs, thats the problem.

Maus was real as well. blink blink

are you forgetting the elefant

O-I is too big, its bigger than the Maus, it would not fit at all on the guadalcanal maps with those tiny bridges, it would get stuck everywhere.

Chi-Se tank would be better because it has the same profile as the chi-ri but with the strength of the ho-ri

7 Likes

I would not consider this blog to be a credible source. The author of this blog has been involved in the Ho-Ri controversy for a long time.

1 Like

Nah, elefant is clearly a Tiger with some crude made box on top - perfectly fits ww2

Not really, it literally looks like a giant SU-76.

1 Like

when choosing between Chi-Se and O-I, I would prefer to see both tanks, I must admit that their introduction is a direct way to see the Ferdinat tank, Jagdtiger, IS-6, American T30 t34 tanks, and of course, in the future, the German mouse too

The Jagdtiger and the Elephant should not be with the Prototypes you mention there - the E-Series fall into the same category.

I compared this technique based on the ratio of weapon and armor, not because it was paper or real/used technique