Asking because this obviously needs to be unified to fit into all campaigns.
I’m asking also because I hope the devs don’t do something like this:
Yeah, even tho STGs aren’t equipable anymore, I still have my tankers able to use them because I never took them away.
besides that we in general don’t have any idea about how the big updates gonna work out, I think we should start a discussion about this.
Removal of any “specific” Stalingrad mechanics should be the only solution right?
I was wondering why that looked wrong.
How they fit? Is simple with the merge or all enginer become like the one outiside stalingrad or all enginer become like stalingrad one, whe can only wait the answer
I mean, that’s my point, which would you prefer?
Im fine with both of them, but i would prefere normal enginer so that all soldier can equip full auto carabine and selective fire, withaut be limited to only enginer and assault/sniper like in stalingrad, in the end endgame player always find a way for exploit the game and spam them so this kind of limitation become unecessary
And before someone can complain that i whant only spam auto, in stalingrad as f2p i can spam 3 full squad armed with MKB/AVT already so there is no point to keep the limit
those are good arguments, personally I would have always said players that want to play “full auto” should be able to do so always, yet if one type of gameplay is superior to others balance for “diversity” sake should be thought about.
But since the new BR system is coming, full auto meta might actually shift in lower BR, while those that like full auto action keep playing on higher BR.
-Which leads me back to your point, at higher BR, there wouldn’t even be a problem with pioneers having assault rifles and such, since it already fits the gameplay.
Well. For me I only want classes to be their own. Whats the point of Assaultern then other than having shitty drums and the OP MP40?
I’m not certain tbh.
I likely will only very rarely use those anymore at all because it will be very sweaty, and unfun matches to begin with, at those br.
My top br might be around semi autos and mp40, pps42 and stuff…
Even if engineers can spam meta weapons, it will be at high br and unpleasant no matter what, so…
I don’t really mind.
i wish they stay with mkbs
like fg42’s
m2 carbines
avt’s and avs.
but that just me
if you keep on claiming that the MP40 is OP, eventually the devs will nerf it, I hope you are aware of this…
But otherwise Soviets will suffer forever.
I assume it’ll be handled with the presets.
Chances are higher to get certain campaigns while choosing full autos.
Personally: I wouldn’t mind to have access to full auto guns in all campaigns.
Id prefer there be a destinction. Engineers and combat pioneers. Dont need all engis being full auto aswell.
But thats me
We still preparing Q&A for you, plus Keofox is working on devblog about New UI
