Another rework idea

Suggestions
1

Considering that every now and then i see front/theater suggestion, here is one that IMHO is superior alternative.

Game progress:

Game needs technology tree like warthunder for every nation. Every weapon and vehicle need to have year of prototype (for possible gold order weapon) and year of service (for campaign unlock). Considering that some weapons were either available in small quantities after entering service, or are OP for game balancing reasons, we can further put star rating that is currently available in game for particular year/campaign. E.g. panzer 4 ausf. F2 is 6 star on Moscow (so beginning of 1942, btw bad example cause it was not present in moscow), but it is 5 star for Stalingrad (late 1942, early 1943) and 3-4 star for Berlin (panzer 4 ausf. J is 4 star for Berlin)

Equipping squad with unlocked weapons:

Now we can equip selected nation default squads with weapons (by default I mean like rifleman 1, 2, 3 or assaulters 1, 2, 3 ). Game would prompt available campaigns depending on the loadout you have selected. So you can have all kar98 and panzer 2 selected in loadout, but if you equip one soldier with stg 44 you can only play campaigns where stg 44 was available (e.g. Normandy and Berlin). Game would also calculate battle rating for every available campaign depending on your loadout. Idk if average loadout BR, or vehicle weighted BR or max BR for your loadout would be the best.

Campaigns:

Would be set of maps and regiments/uniforms for default squads. Every default squad would have real life regiment that was historically in that campaign with appropriate uniform.

Matchmaker:

Depending on the availability of campaigns and BR, MM would try to match you across multiple campaigns. You would be matched with +/- 1 (or 0.5, depending on the number of players available) of your loadout BR.

Think that this covers most of the players requests over the year. Unified grind, multi campaign MM, historical accuracy and balanced game for newbies and veterans. This suggestion could probably use more work, but basic idea is here.

5 Likes
2

We cant simply make an axis vs allaies matchmaking with all map?

Alongside a national tech tree and we get

  • Us,Uk + (colony),soviet
    Vs
  • ger + (minor),ita,jap

Withaut care about japanese in tunisia or germans in iwo jima because, this stupid neccessity of make the game forcefully historically accurate wen a more arcade and fresh approch to the game can make this game 100 times better, dont have sense

Think about it In a bam

  • grind problem is resolved, you grind only the faction and equipment you like
  • splitted playerbase is resolved, you have to choice only two side
  • no more campaign only map
  • we can add sidegrade,halftracks,medic,jeep,armored car,more BA and all the other shit
    Ecc…
3 Likes
3

At this point BFV will be more authentic.

6 Likes
4

Enlisted is basically war thunder with infantry let him be like war thunder, is better

5

oh that won’t resolve the grind, they will just increase the exp amount or decrease the amount of exp you can earn in a battle

i really don’t think a BR system could work since you could eventually get things like panthers or tiger 1s fighting in the jungles of vietnam with FG42s against north vietnam armed with AKs and t-54s and if you think that can’t happen well you really don’t know gaijin nor war thunder

2 Likes
6

It resolve, most people want play one faction and after try the other, now we have to grind the same faction every time and worst we have grind thing we dont want

7

i dont think this game could survive anything besides ww2. and even then campaign availability would make ineligible those kind of pairings. only if gaijin and DF goes totally crazy can this kind of thing happen…

8

depends on what campaign with something like since vietnam would absolutely draw in an audience while something like Napoleonic wars or ww1 wouldn’t

1 Like
9

But the sixth MP40 would?

1 Like
10

wait for 7th in couple of months…

11

Warthunder is any nation vs any nation. We don’t want that here.

3 Likes
12

I like the tech tree, but not the BR

I am a big supporter of this!