I’m not really sure if it’s been suggested in the past or not, but I would like to suggest that the ammo pouch could give extra ammo to your secondary weapon, like your trusty pistol…
12 Likes
Artillery Luger!!!
1 Like
Ammo pouch is for main weapon, which is what you as soldier is dealt and supposed to solve situation with. Sidearm like pistols are for backup, reserve and we get aldready enough ammo for it.
As for secondary weapon that should imo be removed form game, Soldiers should only cary 1 main weapon.
IRL a soldier carries a main weapon, the knife and officers, sergeants or MG gunners usually have pistols, another main weapon is not effective and is unecessary weight.
ANd In-Game it translates into unrealistic gameplay and adds to the ‘‘CoD’’ pray n spray kind of gameplay that is associated with unrealistic shooters for kids with adhd.
Enlisted should be about realism and should imo be striving for becoming more realistic and grittier and gameplay needs to be sloved down in movement and restricted in weapons.
so 1. we don’t need it
and 2. we shouldn’ need it
2 Likes
as someone that occasionally goes pistols only … yeah i like this.
1 Like
Although the realism is correct, in the usual standard it used to be an extra magazine, there were cases in which some soldiers carried up to 2 or 3 magazines also officers, and that’s how we could make with small pouch 2 magacines and 3 with big one
we need restrictions on ammo and movement in this game for it to become a better pace with the gameplay, more ammo is jsut going to lead to more pray and spray which is the least this game needs.
And also you doing wrong if need that much ammo, and aswell with sidearm, you shouldn’t be needing that, and lastly, there is still amoo boxes that also would be less meaningful the more ammo you already can carry from start
1 Like
Yeah the second gun slot bugs me. Plus sidearms just weren’t given out except to the roles you just mentioned. It’d be fine left the way it is though, no need to change anything now.
Well, the game as far as it is, it’s not realistic at all, it is more focused in a more arcade approach and thats fine, its not like we need a Hell Let Loose or similar type of game again as a copy, there is also the option to not use that feature and use or even not use backpacks, as you can equip whatever you want in your squads, no limits whatsoever.
1 Like
I’d like to see a pouch for the AT gunner which increases ammo for AT weapons.
2 Likes
Speak for yourself, I need it for my auto colt and auto Mauser.
I would main those weapons if I wasn’t out of ammo after few seconds of shooting.
5 Likes
if you see perks bags or second weapon,I always choose bags and I believe ammo pouch should be able to do that,sometimes I do supressive fire when I ran out of main gun and I use pistol
yes it needs to be more like HLL, more realistic and historical.
To get rid of bad arcade gameplay which is the worst kind or shit games there is.
You sound like you should go play Fortnite instead, this is a Historical Squad based FPS. a WW2 Squad based FPS more specifically about hte HISTORICAL concflict called World War 2, and all weapons and vehicles in game are from that Historical concflict same As the Quads themselves.
And the Game is about portraying that said Hsitorical Conflict in a immersive fun way with a Game.
You want shit Arcade, go play Fortninte or CoD with the other Kids, stop pretending this is the game for you
The number of players in HLL seems to be pitiful.
1 Like
I don’t give a flying F about how many play HLL, I play Enlisted, and I want Enlsited to have and strive for and improve upon Historical and Realism aspects of the Game, that’s what I said and it meant
I just wrote 1,000 words of thoughts in Chinese
But I decided to reduce it to a few sentences
When a game is too realistic, most players will evaluate it the same way you evaluate an arcade machine.
Everyone has high expectations for the game
but
Or your expectations and disappointments for this game
Maybe you should play some games that meet your expectations
Such as Battlefield or Hellfire
But I guess you have to find a server without cheats and dictatorship first or find enough people to start a game.
Or I Play this Game which I like and oppose all who try to ruin in, and every decision that tries to water down and tunr the game into more arcade bs and instead work as in advocate for increased realism and historical accuraccy.
You can make a Game both Historical and Fun Gameplay, just because you can’t grasp or come up with it doesn’t mean others can’t
No one will object to your tichang
But I can’t find a reason to support the project you proposed.
Anyway, it is the official decision whether to do it or not.
Even if the reform fails, it will only waste players’ money and the game will go bankrupt.
If you want to really tackle arcadeization
It would be best to ask the authorities to separate monkeys and parasites from humans first
Instead of cramming in more professional content