So Japan is ignored
Because I play the United States more than Germany, but the next version of the United States does have a lot of “miracle weapons”
i would like if there was SBMM or at least partial SBMM that would create somewhat equally skilled teams(e.g. 1 high skilled, 3 medium skilled and 6 low skill players per team instead of 2 high skill and 6 medium skilled players in one team vs low skill in other).
sadly that would require moving from faction vs faction MM which lot of players wouldnt want.
1 Like
They will make no difference because of stacking and population migration U.S/Great Britain is still going to get bodied like usual I can’t enjoy the game because literally every match I have to carry my team and be sweaty as fuck unless I play low tier then its too damn easy and the rewards are shit.
Then just find yourself a teammate, that’s literally the best solution for stacking. 
Oh yeah sure Adamnpee why don’t you to take this complimentary 105mm barrage on your way out 
1 Like
In that case, I have an even better solution for you, just stop playing the game.
I won’t have to read your pathetic cries about how terrible and more or less unplayable the game is.
The game isn’t unplayable though its just mildly inconvenient at times I don’t know what your talking about did Darklflow piss in your cereal again?
1 Like
brother, it’s not about winning. Even though I almost exclusively solo queue with random factions I still hover around 70% win rate. (I almost never babyrage out of games either - I might break down if it’s like 10th defence or Conquest in a row)
I’m just sick of one sided stomps (or the fact that I often win games just by the fact that I can drag the game out long enough for enemies to start ragequitting)
I just want games where both teams are reasonably capable
I don’t know, I’ve been playing high BR German games lately and percentage-wise completely one-sided games are the exception rather than the norm. I haven’t played Japan tho.
What bothers me much more is when my rally points are constantly getting destroyed. And I’m forced to pound the air with a hammer more than shoot and play an fps game.
I’ve ragequitted several times over that.
AP mines are the solution here.
And this design is the one you use when you know your opponent uses a lot of support and cas.
That or build the first one inside a structure.
They are not. I tried.
Once you’re not playing against stupid opponents, they can figure out pretty quickly where your team spawns from and that’s probably where your rally point is going to be.
I really do not enjoy matches against tryhard rally point hunters. There’s nothing more frustrating and annoying than that.
Sometimes I think the game would be a lot better if there were no rally points. At least then death would have greater meaning and it wouldn’t just be about who has more effective rally points.
I really don’t have time to waste time on something like that in balanced match. Plus any competent player will your throw explosive at it.
it’s not gonna stop me true but it works pretty well on your average Joe.
this is stupid design for rally point… it just slows down spawned people. you should always leave opening for people to exit and if you want to protect that opening, you build another sandbag 2 meters away. that way spawned people wont lose 2-3 seconds climbing sandbags.
1 Like
Average Joe is not my problem.
nah it spawns you on top of the bags in most cases in my experience
2 Likes
there is a reason for that exact positioning.
most of the times i am just stuck in there having to climb when i spawn on similar rally points. it is really annoying.
They ain’t doing it right then if they aren’t in that exact orientation you will get stuck because you won’t spawn on the bags