Alecto I and sIG 33 carrier shouldn't be same BR

15 cm sIG 33 B Sfl:

  • 11.1s reload
  • 8.6 kg HE and 185 pen HEAT
  • 9HEAT/9HE

Alecto I:

  • 8.6s reload
  • 666 g HE and 110 pen HEAT
  • 21HEAT/20HE/7SMOKE

Wather 15 cm sIG 33 B Sfl with 100% HE (yes, that’s a buff) to BRIII or Alecto I to BRI

3 Likes

Alecto could be br 1 tbh. Open top, no armour, pretty slow reload and average he splash. The pen is good but doesnt matter in low br when everything is weakly armored

1 Like

Alecto I to I since M8 is already better than it for similar flaws.

There should never be a vehicle in BR1 that can wipe a team in 1 shot. Those tanks are fine in BR2 because they are paper thin to kill yet have bite if in a BR3 match. Perfect

1 Like

I think both are fine at BR2 and I dont see how one going to BR1 and the other to BR3 is fair since allies only plays vs Japan and Germany while Germany plays vs allies and USSR also at BR3 Germany they would see stronger tanks and probably waste a tank slot for better tanks while for allies at BR1 people that do have the SPG would most likely just camp in the back shooting people that are new or dont have the correct gear equipped to destroy the spg. They also can get lucky and get a down tier match while playing br2 or up tired and play vs br3

1 Like

Alecto frags

Second to most amount of frags is so average right?

AKA it does not even trigger APHE fuzzes unlike most with just bad armor

While the alecto might not be the bes for BR 2 it also isnt the worst in BR 2 so it should stay there in my opinion.

Frag are just part of HE damage
And it isn’t good even just compare frag
image