Again and again this favoritism gajjin

in the last update:

The suspended bombs on the Bf 109 F-2 have been disabled, as its opponent on the opposing team does not have them.

on the assumption that the enemy does not have it, so we remove that for the sake of equality. but why the ally remains always much more equal than the ax … to take only this example: first model of armored tank to unlock by nation m14 / 41 for the ax a13mk2 for the ally.

the ax has a commitment of 25 cartridges and 1500 in reserve

the ally has a commitment of 250 cartridges and 3250 in reserve

how is possible? why not remove an engagement of 250 cartridge from the ally because the enemy does not? if it is so as not to distort and modify the characteristics of historical , why then disarm an aircraft? under the pretext that in front of him does not have this weapon?

7 Likes

I dont think it might be favoritism from Gaijin, i think its merely bad balance system in place. Some campaings are easier towards side A and some are easier towards side B. Often in these said campaings i find my matches most of the time won by side A, or some campaings won by side B… It is quite unfortunate.

They have different loading mechanisms also you know the last major gaijin gave the axis the stg for Normandy and Moscow

2 Likes

this is the first post I wrote on it. and this post was reflected on 860hours on war thunder and several tens of hours on enlisted so far. the balancing of a card / weapon / vehicle game may not be easy to manage it is for sure. but always the feeling of being restrained as much as possible with the axis and boosting as much as possible with the allies. so recurant that I suspect that this unbalancing is done on purpose

1 Like

that’s hardly an excuse, not when its a pisstake to reload

2 Likes

Wich is for sniper and not assault, something that suck ass.

And by the same time they gave the PPSh41 with 1150 rate of fire and 73 ammo agains’t the Beretta M38 with 690 rate of fire and 20 ammo.
Is it normal ? Would you even play this ? I don’t think.

2 Likes

russian developer il just leave that there.

5 Likes

He is talking about the ammo count, where it’s clear that the Italians aren’t using belts, so yes that due to the different Loading mechanisms the best way I can compare it to is dt having 61 rounds and mg34 having 150

21 / 5000

Résultats de traduction

or is this confirmed?

›One is a belt fed MG
›Other is a dogshit mag fed MG
Only schange that should be made is mag fed coax being reloaded in like 2.5-4 second

2 Likes

Already incorrect.

The first tank to unlock by the allies IS NOT the A13, it is the Damlier Armoured Car, a much worse tank than the M14/41.

But then again, look at the Moscow campaign, the Soviet tanks have 57ish rounds, while the German armour has a much larger ammo belt.

But do people complain?
No

You know that high fire rate works against the ppsh, the 71 rounds drums exist because of the high rof, since you are basically going to be mag dumping most of the time. Also the Americans get another Thompson that fires faster so it’s the same gun with a different bolt. So yes I do play this game

We’ll most likely be getting an assaulter version in the future

Beretta needs the bigger magazine, you’re right.

Yes, I’m actively playing Moscow Germany rn and dabbing on PPD/PPSh players with my MP-40s

1 Like

Woa there, I must stop you. As an ardent lover of the Moscow campaign who plays BOTH sides, I feel obligated to say that the stg42h does NOT suck ass. It’s the most versatile weapon germany has in perhaps EVERY campaign put together! It’s great close to mid thanks to quick rof, and it’s even great long range thanks to it’s scope and 30 ammo mags. You can suppress enemies from afar like there’s no tomorrow. Certainly, Soviets got the more than adequate ppsh41 while Germany get a less than adequate beretta with 20 ammo… but I feel the stg42h greatly makes up for it. In the end, Moscow is still the most balanced campaign out there.

Play Moscow™

6 Likes

T-50 il just leave that there.

Not exactly sure why this shit comes up everytime as its irrelevant as fk.

I don’t said the stg suck ass, I said the thing is only sniper can use the stg, THAT suck ass since sniper squad with max 5 men is not optimal for the playstyle of this weapon compared to other squad. You don’t have the double bomber + a gunner + 4 assault like the assaulter squad

ESL ghostofishmael is here
Report and ignore

maybe the translation or the terms are not adequate with the translation I believe you.
and people complain about a scale that balances strength, but will always tip more one way than the other. on a lot of points. and allowing a weapon to perform well will never bring that balance of power back into balance.

I’m glad they released finally the PPSh, it’s an iconic weapon but i’m really disapointed that they gave to axis the M38 with a magazine of 20 bullet at the same level, that’s the problem. This weapon has nothing to do on this campaign, It’s like they released something randomly because they were lazy, pathetic.

3 Likes

Ah yes, I understand.

But thankfully, you don’t need that weapon on assaulters! It’s seriously great, even in the hands of snipers wich you can add in petty much any squads. Even a single guy armed with this is enough to make carnage (love the thing).

Meanwhile, I conced the ppsh41 is a God tier smg that the beretta with 20 cannot measure with… but it’s only great at close to mid range. Risks of casualty is way higher for those guys as they have to get close, and Moscow greatly favour long range and BA (:heart: ) play.

Play Moscow! ™