. %2fJapan%2f05-SPG%2fType95-Jiro-Sha%2fp1.jpg&ehk=OvICIgnjqEWatmaDv3Mev3pfWHkDO6dti4Ln71QFFM4%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0)
. %2fJapan%2f05-SPG%2fType95-Hiro-Sha%2fp1.jpg&ehk=pf4DWAHIQ9eLuCKL11KtM6sWtnLPBAipp2ekekqcLBs%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0)
. Add the Shiro-Sha , Hiro-Sha to tech tree and Remove Ho-Ri making it legacy to only those who unlocked bought it earlier
3 Likes
I am highly against removing stuff. Why not have them all?
4 Likes
Variants
As limited as the production of this vehicle was, Self-Propelled Gun (SPG) variants were conceptualized, with 2 chassis handed over to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries for testing.
These chassis became the bases of the Ji-Ro/Ji-Ro Sha (Left) and the Hi-Ro-Sha (Right). These Tank Destroyer variants were mounted the powerful Type 14 105mm Gun, also known as the “10-cm cannon”. The Hi-Ro Sha was an open top vehicle, with the 105mm gun munted at the front behind a small gun shield. The Ji-Ro/Ji-Ro Sha was a bit more of an extensive modification. A large case-mate was placed on the rear of the tank, with the 105mm mounted inside. While the Hi-Ro did reach the Prototype phase, it is unclear wether the Ji-Ro did as well. No photos of it are known.
The Prototype Hi-Ro/Hi-Ro Sha. While there are a few photos of this vehicle, none seem to remain of the Ji-Ro. Photo: – Radikal.ruType 91 & Type 95 Heavy - Tank Encyclopedia. 
. Cause tg Ho-Ri I/prototype are fake as hell, and vert hated
2 Likes
None of them are powerful enough to replace Ho-Ri.
This vehicle actually use a 120mm cannon and it is weak.
The Type 14 105mm Gun is not really powerful against tank consider the mediocre velocity. Other source said that it was actually armed with the 105mm Type 92 cannon which has higher velocity. But even with that, it will just be comparable to dicker max, which is on br3.
5 Likes
Rather be event for Japan as they barely get any instead of removing things
3 Likes
Also Japan tech tree is smallest out of all nations make no sense to removing anything instead add more
. No this Shro-sha BR5 Hiro-Sha BR4, which has to be better than |Armor|10–50 mm (0.4–2.0 in)|
| — | — |
|Main
armament|1 Ă— 10.5 cm schwere Kanone 18|. .
Ro-Go Armour
front / side / back
Hull
25 / 25 / 25 mm
Turret
12 / 0 / 0 mm
Visibility
107 %
Crew calling BS even Japan would add more armory. Even for japan the French model 120 mm Schneider-Canet 1898 cannon would have been obsolete. List of Japanese military equipment of World War II - Wikipedia
Schneider-Canet 120mm 1897. 120 mm Schneider-Canet M1897 long gun - Wikipedia.
French model 120 mm Schneider-Canet 1898 cannon - Zoeken.
http://landships.info/landships/artillery_articles/Canon_120_M1878.html. !
What even is this mess?
the armor/armament of the DM. .
Vehicle_armour)|10–50 mm (0.4–2.0 in)|
|Main armament|1 Ă— 10.5 cm schwere Kanone 18|.
No the Si-ro Sha is BR5 Hi-ro Sha BR4
What does this thing even mean? You are suggesting to put them on br5 and br4?
You know that they are too weak for those br?
2 Likes
Read above the Ro-Go is a work of fiction and not the Hiro/Hi Ro Sha. model 120 mm Schneider-Canet 1898 cannon Was obsolete in WW1 and not a gun used by Japan in WW2 with that error i hardly trust the tissue paper armor attributed to the Ro-Go
What to read above? There is nothing above to prove the Ro-Go EXP is a work of fiction.
They were used as coastal cannon in 1930s. So it is still possible to be arm on such vehicle.
It’s not like Japan tanks have good armor to begin with.
Moreover, as I said on top even with the 105mm Type 92 cannon, it will only be comparable to dicker max that is on br3.
1 Like
thats why i dont trust the Ro-Go. 10 cm schwere Kanone 18 - Wikipedia Type 92 10 cm cannon - Wikipedia. Si Ro Sha gets. Ho-Ri. still what armor its clear the Go-Ro has the wrong gun
You can’t even read the number? It literally says 75mm, not 120mm.
You have yet to give any source to prove it.
and the 120 would be completely different 1897/1898 are nearly identical. 
. Naval could be a match…stop ignoring my posts the 75mm 1898 varies only in size not form and 1897 to 1898 not even that…even the 1898 naval is not a match unless they chopped the end of even then the Ro-Go has the wrong gun its not a shotgun/rifle you do not just cut it down
The 75mm literally look like a straight tube, while the 120mm 1897 you posted clearly see wide to narrow.
How do you know that when you can’t provide a photo.
It is possible for a gun to have variant of different length. For example the 1897 for Serbian and Bulgarian have different length.
Tbh it is worthless to discuss what gun it is since it is how it is in war thunder and will remain the same if been added to Enlisted.
The main point is even if you are right, those vehicles are still not worth br4 and br5.
So what is the point of showing me the model 1878 instead of the 1897 that we are talking about?
my bad the 1898 is a fake gun only warthunder mentions it 1897 long 