This gun fitted M1 bayonet and telescope
11 Likes
Not M1 Garand C for US Army.i want this one.it is cool.
Same ad AVS36 Sniper for USSR team.
3 Likes
This is not T20 most likely E1 or E2 T20 couldnāt accept bayonet also from muzzle brake its obvious that this is not T20 but yes why not add it M1C Garand isnāt as good as snipers from both Germany and UUSR
4 Likes
Regardless, sheās still a T20 variant.
it about time US get an auto sniper rifle like german and russian tbh
Germans do not have auto sniper atm.
FG with its huge ass dispersion simply cannot be considered as sniper weapon.
6 Likes
what about the mkb and stg tho i used them as sniper (altho i guess it technically not eh idk)
Not much better, 0.20 and 0.19.
Itās kinda funny theyāre more accurate than FG tho 
6 Likes
Would love it so much if they actually fixed the FG sniper.
4 Likes
At least, it is the best choice as Tier 5 than M1C.
2 Likes
okay, keep the full auto dispersion for this as well,
āsnipingā with a full auto, full powered rifle is really ābig brainedā, shouldnāt work .
Iād increase the dispersion of the AVS (Sniper) and AVT (sniper) as well. or at least make it clear theyāve got a similar level.
It already does not for any sniperā¦
Recoil, even if controlled, is still too big when looking down a scope. Full auto is only good for emergency cqb on those. You snipe while semi.
Soā¦ FGs should have less dispersion so that aimed shots, at least, are accurateā¦
idk; looking at the āresource sheetā
Iād still prefer to increase the AVS-36 (sniper)'s dispersion, say to 0.09-0.10, maybe reduce the FG-42ās to 0.11ā¦ but really they were both a mistake to add in the first place IMO.
I honestly donāt see the point of sniper III, they seem like theyāre out of place in a game that is trying to constantly communicate ātake the point! get on the point! get on the point! get on the point!āā¦ to the extent it took as long as it did for anything to be done in addressing bipods.
I donāt want added dispersion for ANY faction or weaponsā¦ if it were me Iād remove it entirely and add recoil insteadā¦ 
why was it added in the first place? when was it added?
Lmao, seems like youāve never used this weapon xD itās impossible to efficiently snipe full auto because of recoil.
(With bipod maybe, but then I donāt see any problem)
Plus full auto means, you really donāt care about dispersion. 
Please, do not comment on something you donāt know anything about.
if you canāt communicate what the problem is to people outside of your circleā¦ (which lets face it, would only be Tier V Axis mains who bother playing sniper at all), how can you communicate your point acrossā¦ the only other people with an auto sniper are the sovietsā¦
this isnāt even getting to a glaring problem with OPās proposal for the US to get a T20 sniper,
>-what will Japan get?
This game is frankly past the point where Iād feel confidence in relying on some notion of āasymetrical balanceā that didnāt have tit-for-tat counterpartsā¦ the f2p model simply doesnāt support it.
thatās why I agree with calls for the M2 Carbine to be moved to Assaulter-only or for some other exchange to take place.
itās also kind of why I was never a fan of the FG-42 from the moment I learned that it was classed as a āinfantry rifleā in the game lol.