This is insulting, because all nations have at least 1 smoke grenade, I suggest add them:
M22 for americans (1940 version if my photo is wrong help me to fix it)
Japan One (it exist also a withe phosporus but many would cry if I ask it)

WP Rifle Grenade:

Soviet could use american one because they don’t have during ww2 as far I know
11 Likes
a WP rifle grenade sounds hilarious not gonna lie
5 Likes
and the worst is they even have prototypes for bring more damage to their enemies, I have a book who explain it :3
1 Like
???
It’s related to tanks, and besides japan at least 1 tank of each nation has smoke grenades (japan simply didn’t make any tank with smoke grenades)
yeah ugh…
i’m noticing alot of confusion from a lot of people.
but no.
it wasn’t actually added.
long story short, this:
since it’s intruction, had access to the canister smokes. ( located back at the edges of the bottom corners. the 3 tubes. )
the same ones that most later war tanks have.
but for some reason, in 3 years DF never actually bothered to link the code to the turrets.
a bit hard to explain, but basically, the tank always had these canisters functional.
all it was missing, was the input code.
which tommy back in 2022 managed to make for his mod.
way early.
but whatevs.
now they just made them usable.
4 Likes
BTW also, Japan made tanks with 37mm HE shells. Which are not present on any tank from Enlisted. Only because they are not present in War Thunder…
1 Like
Sherman smoke shells should be WP
You’re not missing anything being without them, trust me. You still have to direct impact anyone to kill em with 37mm HE
Isn’t M89 a perchloroalkane and zinc?
Don’t quote me on this, but I would doubt any tank smoke is actually WP. Phosphorous is generally less stable and far more flammable, which in general isn’t great for tank shells. Hydrocarbons(in this case a chlorinated hydrocarbon) is far more stable and requires something else to get it going.
M64. 75mm shell M64 is WP. M88 is the 76mm shell, but I can’t see if it’s WP or nkt
M64 functions differently than traditional smoke, though - it’s a burst charge(e.g. it releases all of its smoke at once) instead of over a period of time(like M88/M89). So depends on if M88 is classed as a chemical or smoke round - if it’s smoke it’s likely the same comp as M89, but if it’s a chemical round it’s probably similar to M64.
From my research that’s why M65 was used. It was instantaneous cover as well as potentially offensive if need be
M65? Also I meant like a WP shell will detonate and release all its smoke at once, while a “traditional” smoke shell takes longer to burn to releases smoke for longer. Especially useful in windy conditions.