Infantry is the core force of the game, if one faction is best at infantry then the game needs serious rebalancing.
Every faction needs equal power and access to SMGs, Assault rifles and select fire guns because they are the main power in this game. If semi autos or MGs would be meta we could start having a discussion about asymmetrical balance, but most semi autos are simply fillers because you cant give every soldier in your squad a SMG, while MGs can not compete in a direct fight with SMGs because of dispersion.
Every nation needs equal anti tank launcher capabilities, so that infantry can deal with tanks.
Every nation needs the same capabilities of Assaulters weapons at all BRs so that the core gameplay stays fair.
If those two things get the most attention, the games core gameplay will be balanced.
Because if a tank outperforms other nations tanks - then at least infantry can take it out at range.
Because if a MG can be used very effectively on the move and is better than other nations MGs - at least every nation has SMGs that perform at least equal.
Because if a nation has access to better semi auto rifles early in the techtree - at least SMGs are decent at mid range anyways.
This core of the game is not really balanced right now, US infantry can not deal with high BR tanks because they still have no super bazooka, soviet body armor influences german SMGs greatly. Thompsons still seem rather weak, type hei combines assaultrifles with selectfire rifles as in killing in one shot AND having a 30 round mag with practically no recoil.
The US now has a selectfire weapon, which was desperately needed, but there still is some work to be done at the core balancing of the game, which we should talk about first before getting upset that you unlock a BR3 weapon before BR2 weapons.
Not really, its because of that armor myth being âOPâ and Germany lacking new contents unlike Allies/Soviets that recently got several events towards them. If there is lack of events for Germany to get a new gun, you would get bored too and rather decide to shift to Allies/Soviets yes?
Wouldnât mind Germany having PPS, PPSH-41 & Body armor for GE
You can give me your MG 42, Sd.Kfz.250, Tanks like either Panther, and Tiger seriesâŚ
Just like I said, they can replace it with RPG and PTRD TYPE A
Well Soviet didnât have rocket launcher added for BR 3-5 in real WW2, so adding captured weapons makes sense.
Thats quite funny sht coming from a guy considering mg13 as op.
T-20 ~ twice better recoil than FG42 + arguably best lmg if not even best gun in game m2 stinger.
Who could have guessed.
GE did actually get a tiger some months ago, ironicly I did not see any significant increase in skilled playerbase of GE.
So quite sure its not just something new or event.
BR 2 equipment for BR5 equipment, sounds fair and not at all biased.
Quite funny when I see some german mains crying over weapons that Soviets use to kill fascist soldiers just like in real life. Yes MG 13 in BR 1-2 is pretty op with low recoil and decent ROF.
Oh look, there is MG 34 at BR 3 which you can use to harass smg soviet mains with its low recoil that can be made like a laser by perks. That is quite funny shit from a guy who never played the game.
Good you gone far from Soviet and going towards Allies, that is where I agree with you on. Their vehicles are OP with double turret tanks in BR 2 literally destroying tanks easily with bias armor.
Yes that is it, ever since the merge I noticed only Allies/Soviet or Japan having content updates.
PPSH-41 drum is BR 5 equipment, and since you guys think that Body armor is so âOPâ, then I will add its value just like BR 6 or too worthy equipment. So why not give me your APC, MG42, and Lets say, Panther tanks? Sounds like a fair deal afterall not biased
Well if DF replace with ww2 RPG and type A launcher, I would love to use them. If they canât, then capture weapons stays feel free to say that its asymmetrical balance issue. Afterall irl Soviets used these german panzerfaust to destroy them which I dont mind using them either.
Quite sure the points are explained more than once now.
But as you said earlier you dont really care much about the meta. Which is rather clear with your statements.
As well as highlights the fact that you dont know anything about this game.
Well no, apparently you have hard time to understand sentences too.
Subject was player shifting, which currently favors US due to M2 & T20.
Yes, they actually did. Apparently history isnt one of your skillsets either.
