In invasion mode, campers and anchors make the whole team lose, no matter you are defenders or attackers, especially in the case when your squad died = the point lost, only to get their pathetic 3 or 4 kills. We could add barrier troops to kill and frighten these retards, and restrict it to players who rank between 1-5. Even though we have flamethrowers now, but it’s way too slow and ineffective to finish the job. Since each faction had barrier troops more or less, I believe it’s for a reason.
We won’t encourage any form of teamkilling. If you want to win, you should have friends teaming up with you instead of complaining other players. Players have their right to play as they want to.
6 Likes
I think nerfing snipers/sniper rifles would be enough.
Definetely no need for that. Sniper rifles are normal rifles with scope put on it. How do you expect to nerf them?
And that would not change anything. New players just need to learn the game. And if someone is worse in it there is no reason to forbid him from playing.
2 Likes
Try build a good forward spawn and it would make some players to use it and push with you as some players may want a better position to snipe to. This is why I always have an engineer on my main squads
sniper rifles certainly don’t need nerfing. It doesn’t matter what game you play, there is this fantasy people have about sniping and how cool it is. So you end up with teams full of them. And it doesn’t matter what game it is.
When it comes to an objective based game, snipers are a burden regardless of how good the gun is. Only the top few % of players will use them in any meaningful way.
No you are just going to have to get used to people role playing “shooter” or “American sniper”, they are only there to collect tags, nothing more. Yes would be far better off without them, but then again it wouldnt stop people from camping.
In case you haven’t noticed people have a “sheep” mentality. Lots of games you can see it. safety in numbers, zerging, hiding behind cover.
There is no understanding of battleline, map control, fire superiority, taking the initiative, flanking, Aggression, crossfire etc etc. Just safety and spawn camping
Ohh my. The people who are so eager to “win” in an online video game are quite hilarious. Maybe this uplifts their sense of self worth or make some sort of feel of achievement, I’ll probably will never know.
Many (arguably most) people play for fun. For some, it’s fun to run into a point and start blasting left and right, then watch that capture indicator to tick. The others got a task to kill 20 people using pistol, it sounds like a fun to me and that’s what I’m going to do.
The same goes for the rest of the squads - I’m going to play them the way I want, the way it works for me, the way it’s fun for me. The perception of playing the game in the only one way is so backwards.
You like chaos and meat grinder? Run to the point and be happy. If I need more XP I might join you.
I can’t work out if you are agreeing or not. You basically saying nothing more than what I said, but in a manner that sounds like a rebuke.
oi slow down the only point i want to “win” in this game is so i get mor points and i can get faster to the stuff i want thats all
Yeah, just sit on points for extra XP. That’s how I train all my squads. After the “training” they can be used in others, more fun/useful ways. Like on Moscow, MG teams are excellent to cut down reinforcements on flanks. But require prepared position. Running them into a capture point to be killed by a single grenade or an smg is just a waste of time.
ok i know what you mean but i dont like it if i am playing doing good have fun but thats a waste because (and that happends all the time ) when mee and my friends are not at the point in invasion it falls instant and there you cant have fun because you are just getting fucked