So golden weapon orders will be usable anywhere? Gewehr kurz, Conders everywhere i can see it would ruin Tunisia completely. And M2A1 would ruin Pacific well it could ruin it on paper since Allies pacific is full of bots atm…
3 Likes
So that the reason, why all soviet bolties are unplayable shit?
This could certainly happen, Tiger II and stg44 in Moscow or Tunisia make no sense at all.
My idea is to make backup loadouts, you can use stg44 and advanced stuff only in later war campaigns , while the early war stuff can be used everywhere. Advanced players must provide loadouts for early campaigns, if not they are automatically assigned the best weapons according to the current system.
4 Likes
Wait MP40 got different stats in different campaigns?
Most weapons in the Stalingrad campaign have different stats than on other campaigns.
4 Likes
Maybe not “automatic assign” but give the option to create pre-sets, if they do not have then not possible to queue to a early war battle.
Not only MP 40, but most of inconsistency are in Stalingrad, because they failed to balance it and made irresponsible change to make money.
Yeah they need to force seperate loadouts for each campaign if all the queues are going to be combined.
So if you want to play as Germans and use Assaulter squad, queuing for 5 different campaigns, you will have 5 seperate loadouts depending on the campaign you get thrown into.
I.E you maybe have your Stalingrad loadout setup with Kiraly, your Moscow loadout setup with MKB, your Berlin loadout setup with MP3008, your Normandy loadout setup with STG, and your Tunisia loadout setup for MP40.
(Setups you would make yourself, not premade setups you are forced to choose from)
Edit : This can also prevent super absurd vehicle shit from happening, like bringing the Jumbo to the Pacific.
10 Likes
i have another question. and i’m sorry if has been reposted but…
what happens to the Stalingrad and pacific access pack ?
do the beneficts vanish? or?..
5 Likes
First of all, these are inevitable changes for the survival of the game imo.
But there are some downsides. And I see you adressed some of them.
Maybe some of them will have some solutions, some probably not.
I also like the chatotic nature of mixing all kind of weapons/vehicles.
Also combining new players with veterans are definitely not a bad thing in general. Quite the opposite if you balanced it out. When I was new to the game I learned from these players. They also give me the desire to improve my game.
If these new changes are’nt implemented perfectly these categories of players will never see each other in battle. And both sides will lose of this in the long run.
Regarding your last post:
The only way to circumvent this would be if you were able to “go to battle” with different load-ups:
Squad set up one (4-10 slots)
Squad set up two (4-10 slots)
Squad set up three (4-10 slots)
That would give the players more options and your battles wouldn’t turn in to a small uniform niche/meta.
I like the variety of weapons in this game and have unlocked everything and bought a lot of premiums/gold order weapons.
I would like to bring a lot of stuff into battle (like today) so some kind of system to make it happen should be implemented.
This will also make it possible for new players to play along/against veterans.
Yeah, this is confusing. And I can’t see any good solution to this.
Maybe they thinking about accumulate the BR of all weapons/gear you sent to battle and you’ll get an average rating. This rating is your MM-rating.
So equipping just one Fedorov would not send you to a battle with guys ONLY using Fedorovs (and likewise stuff).
But in that case, I see other exploits - you could bring only starter rifles + one Tiger II, and your average BR would be so low that you only can match against newbies and their t-60s.
2 Likes
This.
Please devs do this.
I’d still be able to use old things for fun.
4 Likes
Please no. Not more unreasonable Weapons and Stuff . I will give it a try , but i think we going the wrong way here. Enlisted will eventually end up as a weird WT \ Battlefield 5 clone ? Hopefully not.
4 Likes
God please no. This sounds horrendous. Might actually be the end lf Enlisted for me.
Once I see FG-42 in Moscow, I’m quitting.
Mkb, PZ 4 F2 are already disgusting. Rpd and AS in Berlin are horrible.
Don’t make it even worse please.
The ONLY reason I switched to Enlisted from BFV was historical restrictions and different time frames for campaigns having period specific weaponry and vehicles.
At least make it so that having an STG will restrict the player to Berlin and Normandy or something.
Jesus this is depressing…
11 Likes
in their defense, BFV does not have enlisted editor.
so considering mr 
said that historical battles will be a thing and creators can decide the equipment that can be used, that’s actually a good thing.
granted, you’ll probably need to still play the base game if you want to use your weapons, tanks etc.
so here’s that. but… not 80% that bad.
Then you will need to unlock the same weapon again in each campaign. It will not fix repetitive grinding the same weapon.
1 Like
I only play Stalingrad and Moscow. Why the hell are they going to force me to play other fronts?? Tiger 2s and IS-2s in Moscow, STG44s in Moscow and Stalingrad, Fedorovs in Stalingrad, LADs in Moscow, FG 42s in Moscow… Is this some kind of early April fools joke??
14 Likes
Anyone with half a brain know that there will be 25 mods for a particular campaign with 5 players in each one if lucky, which will mean no XP but REALISM… this is not the answer, I too believe they need to have restrictions on what you can and can’t bring.
Where are these Alpha testers, who are they, they will either make it break this game, no pressure!
3 Likes
Exactly the reason why I’m not going anywhere bewr WT is because I have no interest in playing a WW2 Japanese tank in Norway alongside the French versus cold War Italian tanks, like wtf.
Now they came for Enlisted.
5 Likes
it’s an easy fix.
Let’s have 6 pinned mods (each for every current campaign) on the top of the screen.
These “mods” are created by DF and works the same as the main game and with restrictions that resembles the current ones for each canpaign.
I promise you those lobbies will be crowded if not full all day long.
3 Likes
The idea of merging all campaigns into one isn’t a good idea seriously. what about old verterans who grinded all campaigns?
Historically accuracy thrown out of the table? really?
IS-2 and Tigers in Moscow? Please no. that will kill the game. super super bad idea, enlisted getting out of beta and this came straight away? without us testing it? what
jap already suffering in pacific with worst equip, so US gets all the best weps and best tanks everything vs the japs who already have much worst stuff? it will be over. jumbos from normandy will destroy everything in pacific.
matchmaking is already okay at the moment with the softcap, any more matchmaking making high level vs high level will be full sweaty and very unfun. a very bad move
14 Likes