I read a bit, so how premium campaigns and squads compensation works has been answered (somewhat at least), and I kinda get it.
How you gonna compensate for other things like paid slot tho? very important, otherwise I guess there won’t be many people paying til this major overhaul drops don’t you think?
1 Like
combination of OP and year of service/production of weapon was my suggestion. but keo mentioned that they gave away with historical accuracy for easier MM.
this is excellent news. it should stop stuart vs tiger situations, or is-2 vs pz 2. it will match sweatlords vs sweatlords and newbies against newbies (or people who want to RP).
there is no skill based MM. there is only equipment based MM. you equip low level weapons, you are matched with other people with low level weapons. you equip high level weapons, you are matched against people with high level weapons.
game has worse problem with seal clubbing now. people equipped with stg44 vs springfields… or tiger vs stuarts. why protect people from skill? they just need even playing field.
1 Like
I actually don’t want to sweat because I’m endgame all the time, if I do this game will get very frustrating and tiresome quickly.
I spent a lot of money and invested in this game since OBT, I do have faith in the devs though, some decisions are dubious (bullet pen) but they will have to monitor this and rollback or change or enhance use of equipment.
They would be crazy to kill their current player base, we like things as they are on the whole.
6 Likes
Not possible to be such re****
Skill and enlisted are not really matching each other
This could kill off Moscow and Stalingrad campaigns completely where we would end up using our Berlin loadouts all the time because of a potentially poor execution of the new system.
10 Likes
What about the campaign specific squads like engineers?
@1942786
In Stalingrad, soviet engineers can build the maxim mg WITH the shield,
in Moscow, soviet engineers can build the maxim mg WITHOUT the shield…
This function better be tied to the specific engineer squads… it would be a shame if one of the maxim models (with and without shield) gets completely deleted…
4 Likes
Well, here’s my opinion:
Assuming I understand correctly; from now on, whoever starts a battle as a German, can randomly enter a battle on either the Moscow, Stalingrad, or Berlin map? Without being able to choose where you want to play?
Because if that’s the case, it’s very sad. This practically turns Enlisted into a War Thunder 2 with the addition of infantry.
And if I wanted to play War Thunder, I’d play that, not enlisted… But thanks, I’m not asking for the WarThunder experience.
Enlisted is unique and special because it has become what it is.
With different SEPARATE ADMISSION campaigns. And with the option to choose… That if I don’t want to play in Moscow because I like Berlin, I just clicked on Berlin and no one forced me to play in Moscow.
Even so, the game often puts me on a map that I don’t like to play through. But at least I could choose which campaign, which theater battles I wanted to go to.
So will this little freedom of decision be taken away from the players? You can choose an army, but from then on you have to accept what the game throws?
So if you delete different campaigns and the map sets that belong to certain campaigns, it would be sad and for me it would ruin your game.
3 Likes
can you also credit us somehow with the hundreds of trash weapons we accumulated over the past 1-2 years? I do remember the economy change but making us manually click for hours to get cards was unreasonable. I still have over 2000 trash weapons, AT rifles, pistols etc…
Thanks
1 Like
It’s not.
It will remove all variations from matchs, it’s something I loved, every match was different, what ppl brought always was surprising. Now you’ll see ONLY one tank variant, every match, and only stg44 vs Fedorov at end game. Nothing else, just that. Cool right? Lvling will be sooo worth it… (not)…
And nobody wants to play JUST with sweat lords. Unless masochists.
6 Likes
Joe i swear to god this mixed campaigns update will kill enlisted faster than apex legends
18 Likes
Way better solution for the matchmaking problem with bots.
Currently i wait about 1 to 1:30 minutes to get in a match if i choose berlin allies only.
How about the matchmaking time will be increased? I would not wait 5 minutes to get a full lobby…. it would be way better than the mixing of all campaigns….
1 Like
It might not be perfect…
Imagine, you want to enjoy Moscow znd use t60 for fun. Axis uses puma.
But what saddens me, except the fact everyone will use the same weapons on every tier, making matchs more like the same everytime…
Is that now… NOW your premium squads will be ABSOLUTELY worthless.
Why? Before, it was possible to use those for fun, when the opposition wasn’t too strong. Now forget about it. It will be a huge handicap 100% of the time.
And let’s not forget about slots! Since they COMBINE all factions… will we have 50 slots for Germans, or just 10??? Less variety. Less fun.
Unless we can have much more slots.
14 Likes
Keep historic accuracy to each battle time period! If these changes go forward then Enlisted is now War thunder. We will be punished for leveling up weapons and squads because we will only face no-life sweats in every fight just because we wanted to enjoy leveling our squads/equipment. The only option is not to level anything which is what I did in War Thunder and why I stopped playing that game. You have just announced the death of Enlisted.
17 Likes
3 things I want in Enliste:
- KEEP IT historical accurate.
- Add mouse and keyboard support for consoles when crossplay is on.
- Add more diversity on the eastern front, romanians, etc
11 Likes
What will happen to the purchased squad slots when armies are combined?
3 Likes
Its mention in the blog
1 Like
so what happen to gold order gun? like what happen to gold order actually because in the picture it premium squad stuff not gold order so im quite concern on what gonna happen to my conder mg and other gold weapon
sorry im not native english
It could be succesful
- if they find a fair way to compensate day 1 players for their money spending
- if the grind at high level Tiers will not be the same as now or even more grind (which i fear, look at WT)
- if they add a winning ration to the weapon Battle Rating…if they dont you will have high level players with a rifle squad killing hundrets of newbies in a low tier game
- if they have good ideas for customization of your troops: e.g. you customize them and they just get an additional camouflage depending on what map you play…
- if the Battle Ratings are done well: find a way to Match a US Tank vs a Königstiger will be hard
- if they come up with a smart idea to give benefits for playing special troops/vehicles…otherwise all T6 matches will be all the same assault Squads on both sides
Lot of work to do…but looking forward how they deal with all these challenges!
1 Like
So I understand this to mean that players will be paired with players using equipment from the same year, but does this apply to campaign mission as-well? Because if the effort is put into classifying weapons by year could you also classify campaign levels by year in the same way? Also, what does this mean for poor-quality late-war weapons like MP 3008 or the Kriegsmodel? Will these weapons be considered late war tech, or will they be given to new players?
1 Like
The only info I need is whether or not USA will be able to use Jumbo in the Pacific, or Soviets with IS2 in Moscow, because that would just be ridiculous
7 Likes