⭐ About the new progression and matchmaking

[GemZhou]

Maybe we can rate map and weapon base on its “year”. A weapon can only appear in any map that the year of battle is after its year of production. This can keep historical accuracy and give least extra constraint on balanced matchmaking.

[Conscript_Joe]

@Keofox

divide World War II weapons into several stages of development. Depending on the equipment of your soldiers, they will be assigned a conditional rating, and in the first stages of matchmaking where the engine is selecting participants for battle, it will try to assemble a session of participants close to each other in terms of rating.

I find everything to be super good news except maybe this point, which I’m not sure.

Will it REDUCE variability of weaponry found in matches?

Mind you, I’m NOT interested to enter sweatlords matches where everyone is using Fedorov vs mkb, and NOTHING ELSE… grinding better stuff will in fact be some form of handicap on fun as we’ll only face sweat lords. Why grind then.

Mm was desperately needed thought. Just hope it will be fine like this.

[Heliks]

Hi.
What if someone unlocked the same tank/gun like T-34 or MP40 twice or more (non mention duplicated rifles)? Will be veterans compensated for this more spended experience?

[Dregomz]

Sounds very promising, finally you won’t need to grind mp40 for 5th time. Also how would it work if you unlocked some late tree unlocks? Are you forced to grind previous guns or you can start from any point you unlocked on new tree?

[Daffan]

They don’t think about things like that, take for example bombing raids – ok in stalingrap OP in pacific.

[GemZhou]

And may be good to make the matchmaking ratings to be visible and show the algorithm.

[JohnAshborn]

Glorious. It’s like you listened to all the things the community kept asking, and then found a way to deliver them in the most perfect way possible. This is just superb awareness and work from the development team. You have my respect, and gratitude, and I’m very hopeful for the future of this game that I love!

[Keofox]

@Ratta_01

Are you freaking kidding me?

Oops. It seems I broke. Sorry.

[NotBuxxy]

This looks very promising and i can’t wait to see it in action, granted there will be many concerns about players earned items and accuracy but i think this is one of the best announcements ever given and will hopefully allow Enlisted to have a very popular future

[Keofox]

We will try to keep as much of your belongings as possible. Others will be redeemed or compensated.

[Conscript_Joe]

At last we can have germans use assaulters stg44 in Berlin now

[Rixas188]

I think a lot of people need to just re-read the devblog again, slowly and in more detail.

So many people getting hot and bothered over things already addressed in here, or asking questions already answered.

And some people acting like this is the last ever devblog and that no future questions will be answered or information will be given

[Keofox]

@Rixas188

So many people getting hot and bothered over things already addressed in here, or asking questions already answered.

And some people acting like this is the last ever devblog and that no future questions or information will be given

Here you can help us. Explain to those who do not understand. We will appreciate.

[Dregomz]

What will happen with Stalingrad full access xp boost, their slots,reduced bronze cost to upgrade., and rank 4 soldiers and weapons in Stalingrad/Pacific when you recruit them? Are you going to implement them to entire nations or just remove them all together stealing our money? I wouldn’t mind more slots across all nations and some permanent xp boost as a compensation.

[Keofox]

@Ratta_01

What do you mean with that?

This is no excuse for disrespect or mocking your players.
In my message there was no personal offense, just an opinion me and other 20 shared, but I guess that is the drop that broke.

I mean, I sometimes use a translator to communicate. I copy other people’s posts. And accidentally broke the text.
There is no need to invent too deep hypotheses that among the many hundreds of messages from other players, yours is somehow distinguished or more important.

[Tatous]

This looks AWESOME. This should fix the problem with this game in its current state not being largely expandable. Also nice to not have to grind so many different germanys. This format is the only way forward for a game that can last. Glad you guys decided on this

[GemZhou]

Consider give different mode to choose in basic game like War Thunder: Arcade, Reastic Battle and Simulator. We may even have different motion speed of solider, different mechanics and size of map aside from matchmaking. In historical battle and simulator, matchmaker should include use of certain weapons on certain maps as constraint.

[gastanofrizzi]

@Conscript_Joe

At last we can have germans use assaulters stg44 in Berlin now

Based

@1942786
Nice news, the best thing we can hope, only 2 question

• japanese and Italain are relegate only in tunisia/pacific or can help german in other battle?

• commowealth forces can be used in normandy and pacific battle as well like Usa or are relegate in tunisia only?

[Swmpzor]

It’s very good news but fix the bots too please.

[Conscript_Joe]

@1942786 Just ONE question about all of this, because pretty much everything else is fantastic news:

• will it STILL be possible for a "low equipment rating " player to face a “maximum equipment rating” plater, or will it not be possible anymore?

What I love in Enlisted is the HUGE variety of different weaponry and vehicles found in matchs. I’d be sad if everyone was just using identical things from now on.

Thanks!