Please revert the changes to the visual recoil, it’s unusable and it looks like you’re having a stroke while firing.
even soldiers need pleasure on the battlefield
So what was said about the nerf mp43.
“it’s still a very good weapon, don’t complain, I like it.”
No, keep that
both are still good weapons, you just refuse to admit it
The change to the MP 43 didn’t cause seizures, it was more in line with the nerf to the Thompsons which made the weapon harder to use, but still very usable. Furthermore, this isn’t a nerf, it’s a bug and should be fixed.
How the f#ck is it the same thing? Do you even have the Browning A6? The weapon looks like it was animated in an indian sweatshop, a complete visual mess and now it’s not even usable.
Good, but not pretty, as it should be. In fact, now others got what they deserved (got off easy).
Looking forward to more news with the nerfs m1919 because it’s not standard enough weapon yet
Oh then we need real nerfs
neither is the FG42s which actually gotten a buff in the last update due to the devs giving all semi auto and select fire rifles another -15% shot deviation to make -30% in total
Oh man, I have an mp43 and no one cared about the changes. You know, the beacon always swings backwards. Is it nice?
I think we need nerfs of reloading and accuracy on the move, because the very heavy m1919 has those characteristics better than mg34 and m42. And also the thinness lowered, right now it is 40% better than the m
I got no clue why all this has to be some kinda competition. If any weapon or equipment in game was nerfed or f*cked in an un-historical way, I’d want them to be fixed, whether it was on the axis or allied side.
The playerbase should be united together to get the devs to change sh*t, not bickering with each other like children and giving the dev’s an excuse to not fix anything. It’s honestly stupid
The 1919 is fine as it was, just undo the nerfs the devs have done previously on things like the M1 Carbine, Semi-autos as a whole, the M1 Thompson and the MP 43.
No problem, in the next major update they would give allies recoilless Johnson 1941 which is more stable than FG42II
You can be sure of that.
Oh no dude. When mg42 got 0.68 dispersion, which means that even at 50 meters the bullet might not hit the body and the movement penalty multiplying that by 3-4 times allied players said it should be that way.
When mp43 got 80dps while PPSh, Fedorov and Thompson got about 120, they said that’s the way to go, with the fact that mp43 has half the accuracy of Fedorov.
So no, they deserve it.
Remind me again why it has a 50% less movement penalty than the mg34, even though it is noticeably heavier?
I would limit myself to small changes in m1919 so that it at least does not violate the laws of physics.
However, as long as mp43 is shit, I won’t help those who so asked for its nerve.
We’ll all be playing with crap thanks to whiners like this.
Otherwise yes, I didn’t support any of the nerf’s listed.
Really not sure which Thompson nerf we’re talking about.
As far as I remember, every MG has the same movement penalty but I could be wrong including the BARs which are by far the lightest LMGs in the game by far.
There was a dispersion and recoil nerf that occurred for the M1 Thompson that occurred before the MP 43 nerf, and it is part of the reason I was less bothered by the MP 43 than most people are.
Penalties vary.
Mg34/42 - 45 units (abstract)
BAR - 20
Colt Monitor - 15
M1919 - 30
I don’t mind the BAR, but the m1919 should have noticeably more than the mg34 because it’s so much heavier. 55-65 I would say.
Tell me the patchbook where Thompson was altered. I’ve been playing since last May and don’t remember that. That didn’t happen.
Visual recoil of SMGs was increased which screwed over all SMGs with aperture sights, you are basically blind while ADS with them.
Pretty much impossible to ADS with the M1 Thompson, it’s the M1A1 or bust. After the changes it’s basically the M2 Carbine of the assaulter class.