Making 20 kills in a game is not difficult, it is difficult - not to lose a match in a team with idiots. You have to have time to do everything. Be on the capture point, build a respawn, shoot down a plane, and so on. The speed of movement is very important. In Normandy let’s say points are captured in 15-20 seconds and the penalty to run with mg will decide victory in the match or defeat when the lone opponent starts capturing the last point
You know I can chop up a lot of players with a saber too, doesn’t mean it’s better than mg
why should you use a BA that is tedious slow and do the same damage of a machine gun, when you can use a machine gun?
soldiers should not revive themselfs with medkits ppl with lmg should not run operate the gun standing, you should die in 2 shoot even with a pistol, explosive should return pre nerf state.
and i could go on, yes this is in fact a game and is not realistic at all
mg has 13.2 damage and never ohk guy with vitality perk - balance
the complete switch for the US happened near the end though some GIs still preferred to keep their Springfields (the a3 and a4 versions) and allegedly the last Springfields were delivered in February of 44
higer level mgs have enough rof to kill anyway, you just need 0.3 seconds more.
1 Like
I don’t understand where the schizophrenic desire to equalize everything comes from. Let’s make m3 and thompson balanced with each other? Why is the latter better than the former in every way?
Probably the same reason why semi rifle is better than BA.
Yeah, and also their spread is 3-4 times higher, so the second shot might not hit.
It isn’t since rof nerf
*making ~80 kills (if I remember correctly), 32 of whitch were made on one life with an unusable MG.
That’s a MM problem, not a weapons problem.
“I can’t run and gun with a 12kg + 5kg of ammo, 1,2m long gun, that has almost 0 ergonomy to be used without a bipod”
2 Likes
That’s your opinion, I was against the nerf, but they are still much better.
I don’t understand what the problem is. The current situation suits everyone. Who wants fantasy BA and masturbate shutter goes to stalingrad, who wants “nubo spam with full auto” goes to other campaigns.
I don’t mess with you and you don’t mess with me.
I don’t even mind if some new campaigns will have the same model as stalingrad, if that’s interesting to someone
Right, they were the only nation to successfully do this during the span of the war.
1 Like
0.5 seconds more in that case
its not balance its a simple formula that exist from decades
slow and require aim skill + damage
fast high mag but heavy + damage (but less than a slow)
fast cqc averaage mag + average damage
3 Likes
Have you ever played Red Orchestra II? For me, that’s a quality example of how BA rifles should feel in a game, and if anything, the changes in Stalingrad actually feel more like the game I mentioned. That’s why I prefer it, at least. Why should we not want a more realistic and better feeling change to a weapon class? It’s an improvement imo and improvements should be seen in all classes soon hopefully, to make it more realistic and fun. The MG change is fine, but they need to get bipods working as soon as possible. It’s a mistake, and the backlash is seen from it, for them pushing that change before fixing the thing they are to rely on now.
3 Likes
If you play any campaign with BA, then keeping your distance will be good. Snipers are much better in tunisia due to maps.
BAs already do damage, which will make the marksmanship player do a lot of kills. However, they do not have to be better than level 30 weapons.
Sorry, that’s like complaining that the puma is worse than the tiger, or that the t-70 is worse than the t34. It’s a game of progression, get over it.
Of course I did, it’s a completely different game, it doesn’t have that kind of grind and progression, so if you like its gameplay play it.
Enlisted different game. It makes no sense to copy others, it will lose to them.
Its…
So yes!
(But buff bipods and revert dispersion meta in return)
I’m not saying to completely replicate the game, i’m saying use the good mechanics from good games to make this game better.
1 Like
If we have a BA at level 40, then let it do 20 damage, but the level 1 weapon must be weaker than the level 30 weapon.
Otherwise I expect a balance between m3 and Thompson
Ba is given to everyone for free, so it doesn’t have to be better than everything else. It’s okay, because the game has a kind of economy.
Rightfully so.
but why you should use them?, everything is better than BA in their current state, they are just begineers throw away weapons
even whit the dmg buff they are not, i would pick an mg anyway over them they are just better than they were before.
and still many high lvl unlock are just sidegrade or just straight worse than previous unlocks