That part was never really confirmed by the devs.
The only thing promised was the one event but they were pretty clear that this would be a 1 off thing when they first announced it.
Even though after an open of the Soviet-Japanese front this AVS early could be a high reliable weapon
Self-loading rifles include:
- Semi-automatic rifle, a type of firearm which fires a single shot with the pull of a trigger, and uses the energy of that shot to chamber the next round.[4] Examples:
- Automatic rifle, a firearm that automatically loads and fires rounds, through the bullet’s energy, as long as its trigger is held down.[4] Examples:
- Selective-fire rifle, e.g. assault rifle, that is capable of switching between semi-automatic, fully automatic and/or burst fire mode of operation. Examples:
it could mean AVS or it could mean fedorov.
t20 can comfortably go against hei AR and t20 is similar to avt40 20. hei AR has its downsides and soviets will not only face japan, but also germany. what are your suggestions for germany buffs then?
Yeah - lets do 30 round FG42 next and 200 round Thompsons.
You know what? Realism is overrated, lets just remove reloading all together. Just shoot and never reload, thats fun!
Anything else you can say or just ?
No, people aint use autofire tbh - both AVS and SVT were known as semi-automatic rifles. Its a lot this name ina a memores
there was no FG with belt. the one you put in the link had magazine that was missing in FW video.
self loading rifle ≠ semi automatic rifle
A self-loading rifle or auto-loading rifle is a rifle with an action using a portion of the energy of each cartridge fired to load another cartridge.
anyways not only you need valid german alternative for 25 round SF rifle, you would also need valid US alternative for 25 round SF rifle.
SF rifles are already too powerful in the game, not to mention boosted 25 round versions of them. SF should be nerfed with higher recoil, so that AR actually have place in the game on BR5.
and US alternative?
btw why do SF rifles need buff? what is exact argument for them? arent they already meta even with 20 rounds?
I like some able to choose - better accuracy or better rof. For no AVT 40 20 have no alternative. But with that stuff will be some options
I fought it was a Tomspon auto rifle or auto Garand very close to it
Better have a BAR for 40 rounds though
I mean no one calls it autorifle - just semi automatic like:
If a soldier gets tired, you take a machine gun or a Simonov self-loading rifle (with a bayonet) and help. Our direction seemed to be going west. Then to Mukden, and from there to Port Arthur.
idk if this is language barrier, but self loading rifle includes semi automatic, automatic and select fire rifles. so while all semi automatic rifles are self loading rifles, not all self loading rifles are semi automatic rifles.
like i said before, even if it was historically used i dont really care. SF rifles are currently making all other rifles obsolete and getting buffed version of current SF rifles is bad for balance. currently there is absolutely no justification for buffing any SF rifle.
5 or 20 round magazine
that is t20. afaik there is only 20 round magazine for it.
not same class of rifles(at least in game). BAR has vastly different performance from other SF rifles.
You are open to suggest anything you want for US. I even get an axis variant. So surely after a Hyde for 5 br something have to be found like this. I`m not US guns superior and cant say directly. But for axis\soviets - there is two good guys for sure.
let me repeat this again if i wasnt clear already:
I can repeat: new content making a game better. Especially good weapons. So avs early for 25 rounds would be a thing people want to take and they would play an event or something
i heavily disagree with this. OP weapons just make every other weapon obsolete. tell me what is current role of assaulters in BR5? they are clearly outclassed by every other soldier class even though they should have been the best class for clearing caps. ffs vanilla rifle squad is better than assaulter squad cause they can have 9 soldiers vs 7 and they have more versatile weapons. buffing SF rifles to be even more OP is just stupid for game balance reasons.
It’s good that meta at 5 br is different to 2-3 br meta I suppose.
According to gameplay 9 x 3 rifleman is longer to grind so that way it better
My friend unfortunately there was one gun that is T-44 prototype which was made by Americans , and as far as I am concerned it post war
A 25 round semi Auto could be G.43(W) (Select fire) with 25 round magazine
Anyway yeah I don’t like the idea of giving more ammo to the SF rifles they are already dominant in BR 5 don’t need to buff them even more