A34 Comet
Weight: 33.5ton
Engine: 600hp
Power to Weight: 17.91hp/t
Armour:
Turret Front: 102mm thick
Turret Sides: 63.5mm thick
Hull Front: 76mm thick
Hull Sides: 30mm thick
Armament: 77mm OQF Mk.II [Real Life Stats]
AP (7.71kg Projectile)
169mm @ 0m at 0 ° – 785m/s
68mm @ 0m at 60 °
121mm @ 1000m at 0 ° – 619m/s
50mm @ 1000m at 60 °
APCBC (7.71kg Projectile)
159mm @ 0m at 0 ° – 785m/s
61mm @ 0m at 60 °
134mm @ 0m at 0 ° – 697m/s
53mm @ 1000m at 60 °
APDS (2.48kg Penetrator)
224mm @ 0m at 0 ° – 1036m/s
63mm @ 0m at 60 °
185mm @ 1000m at 0 ° – 904m/s
52mm @ 1000m at 60 °
HE (6.6kg shell)
580g TNT equivalent and between 500-550m/s muzzle velocity
18 Likes
Its shielding is made of paper, don’t worry
Would this be better or worse than firefly?
Does it matter? Neither of them are meta.
It’s more about trying to play something different. It’s not fun to play the same thing over and over again.
4 Likes
Just wanted to know. I dont play wt so i have no experience with comet
I would say that comet is slightly better.
But in terms of how Enlisted is played and on what maps, both tanks will be below average of performance. And they won’t be easy to play.
2 Likes
Comet’s APDS is much worse than Firefly’s APDS. Comet cannot go through Panther’s frontal plate due to the slope except maybe at very short ranges. The reload is also worse.
But armor and mobility are slightly better compared to the Firefly.
1 Like
Yes, plus the comet has other significant advantages. Like having a legitimate gun depression.
(Probably the most annoying thing about Firefly. You’re always such an easy target because you’re forced to show your whole hull in comparison to other sherman tanks).
1 Like