A vote:

Suggestions
1
  1. Continue to add new (gold) campaigns, extend campaign levels and add senior paid teams
  2. Add more interesting maps, tactics and arms to the existing campaigns, and optimize the game mechanism and playing methods
2

I chose the second

2 Likes
3

Naa more pay to play!!! Cause ya we want to screw over the game so hard no one wants to play it no more :rofl:

1 Like
4

Both

5

You canā€™t expect a small team to do two things at the same time, which means that you canā€™t do either thing well

6

We need to focus and finish/polish the existing campaigns First.

10 Likes
7

I mean Iā€™m personally fine with the game as is and accept that little by little it grows over time. In time weā€™ll get new maps, content, etc for existing campaigns and obviously future campaigns to look foward to eventually

8
  1. please

No need to release new campaigns because it would fragment the playerbase even more, resulting even more unbalanced matches and bot-only teams.

Adding more maps to existing campaigns is a better idea.

2 Likes
9

Pay to play makes it worse also cause while your the only one with a plan and enemy cant get noting but tanks your kindia screwd. And this game aint worth a pot to piss in.

image
image1920Ɨ1080 328 KB

1 Like
10

Did somebody say ā€œFinish the Polishā€?
EkeW9tEWkAAJkVv

8 Likes
11

That was a good one XD

2 Likes
12

Second one. We do not need new campaings at the moment. We have at the current player base ghost campaings for certain factions.

3 Likes
13

Finnish the polish

1 Like
14

Weird vote and pointless.
Andā€¦

Basically the same.

15

I mean more mod weapons and vehicles

16

What is mod stuff?
Medics, SPGs or sth. like this?

17

I feel that adding any more OP weapons will only destroy the balance.
I donā€™t want to see Soviet troops armed with AK-47s and T-55s slaughtering Germans in Moscow in 1941.
Team balance, pesky post-response inoperability bugs, nation-specific anti-aircraft guns, problems with Normandy engineers over-equippingā€¦
The problems are piling up.

18

After the release of the long waited pacific theatre, I stick with 2.

Now it is time to polish the existing campaigns. Stalingrad needs more maps and love. (The other campaigns also) but Stalingrad is currently missing so many maps.

19

I too prefer to see the existing mechanics/features improved, bugs fixed.

The only reasons I could support 1st, would be adding very-early war, ahistoric and historic scenarios (no later than 1940s). The market for WW2 oriented games is already oversaturated, so at least Enlisted could appear as somewhat unique in this regard.

But if itā€™s going to be the typical scenarios between 1941-1945, well, then fixing existing issues is a better approach.

Edit: post 1945 into cold war could also be an acceptable approach to pursue 1st, albeit, not as much, as some folks pointed out with T-55s and AK-47s hanging around in Moscowā€¦

1 Like
20

Yes