Most likely, everyone already has a fully upgraded side or high level(no so matter).
For which you would stop playing, but there is no desire to go through such a terrible grind path again, as well as you have accumulated unnecessary weapons (conditional semi-automatic rifles, when there are automatic ones) and fifth-rank soldiers (for example, a fifth-rank assaulter 1, which you no longer need since you replaced it with a fifth-rank assaulter 3).
Therefore, I suggest a similar mechanics(no matter how absurd it looks, we still have a historical game, then arcade, then realistic, then arcade and unhistorical again).
You can transfer any of your weapons to any campaign and side for a certain number of bronze
orders and this weapon will be replaced by a weapon of the same class corresponding to the number i
n the campaign and will retain all its improvements.(But there are two conditions, the weapon must
be opened in the campaign to which you sent it and you must have its improvements open).
For example:
You have a excess completely upgraded MP 40 in Berlin, this is the third weapon of the German
assaulters in Berlin.
You wanted to some play for the British in Tunisia (at the moment you have a completely upgraded
squad of assaulters and the 8th level of the campaign) and wanted to transfer MP 40 there, you spent
several bronze orders for weapons and got a completely upgraded lancaster.(lancaster are third
weapon of british assaulters in Tunis)
2.The ability to send any soldier of any rank to any campaign or side.(soldier random renamed)
For example:
You replaced your last assaulter 1 of the fifth rank with a assaulter 3 of the fifth rank in Normandy for
the germans.Now you don’t need them, but you would like to use them.
Therefore, you sent him (for certain number of bronze orders) to the american side of Normandy and
received the same assaulter with the same characteristics, but with a different name.(Again, there are
several conditions, the class must be open and you must improve this type of soldier to the right
place in the squad upgrades).
It seems to have written clearly.
If you do not understand, then please clarify, rather than write off-topic and it is not clear what.
Well, after you understand exactly, then write what you think.
If we ever get more Eastern Front campaigns in the future like Stalingrad, Kursk, Operation Bagration, Manchuria, etc. I do wish we can transfer soldiers and guns from the same faction even if the gun for the campaign level is still locked but maxed out on the same faction on another campaign as long as the gun is available to use on that campaign so no late war PPS, DPM in Moscow and stuff.
There’s this feeling of grinding the same faction in another campaign all over again like I did grind USSR Berlin after I grinded USSR Moscow where I wanted to unlock the drum mag PPSh ASAP but having a 3rd Soviet campaign in the future means “Ah shit, here we go again” where have to grind for the same gun I unlocked for 2 campaigns already and if only they remove this level requirement for players who grinded that faction for another campaign so I can use my stockpile of PPSh from Moscow and Berlin to lets say Stalingrad along with the soldiers that I need from my reserves.
Germany got the worst out of it with 4 campaigns and imagine having another campaign like the Ardennes or somewhere else involving Germany for the 5th time would be insane atleast having Japan in the Pacific would be a breath of fresh air even though Americans have to grind from the start all over again for the 3rd time.
so, if i unlocked an mp34 in normandy, and i’ll give it to tunisia, i’ll just get an upgraded mp28?
and why would you think that would ever happen?
it’s in their interest to make you grind over and over with even the soldiers of rank 3 that requires milions of bronze orders ( i’m exaggerating )
you can simply skip them, and once you gained enough bronze order with the maxed out squads of type 1 soldiers you will think/worry to upgrade the others.
but i don’t see how this would benefict or what it would change that much.
all of this mainly comes because of the campaign levels where majority of those are just there to ““fill gaps”” and basically add more grinding for everyone ( which, with premium, it takes you around 1-2 weeks to unlock pretty much everything i still don’t know why or how ),
so it would somewhat require a tech tree where people unlock what they want.
but the problem there is, people would just simply take the meta and don’t even bother with the other stuff. making their game experience much shorter.
More campaigns will mean more need for silver orders as that will be the only way to obtain weapons then so first you have to actually reach the weapon you want to unlock. They know you’ll spend alot of silvers getting to that rank anyway because you dont want to use 1 free MG and all the MGs have starter rifles in the new campaign hence why we cant transfer Enfield No4s, K98s from Normandy or the Bren MkI exists instead of just using the MKIII in Normandy. All about shaking that $$$ out of you in the end
But how many PPD 34s can you transfer from Moscow to Berlin? 0, have to spend silvers to get PPS 42s. How about M3 grease guns that are only in Normandy? Examples like that will make you spend silvers.
I already ended moscow, normandy, soviet berlin 10 days and even german berlin is done, i need to buy only 9 fg42II and use another 30 silver (maybe less) order for tunisi
Im not talking about you…once the bronze system is shut off none of us will have “free” weapons again. It will be the FEW of us with piles of legacy bronze order obtained weapons to include the levels yet to come
I have nothing from this money.So I don’t care.
An idea is an idea and that’s it.
Monetization and blah blah are their problems.
Do you disagree with topic because you care about their earnings?They can take care of themselves.
Well. I managed to more or less finish the US side (i think it was from level 22) by excessive usage of P-47, A-20, P-38 and tanks. Its possible (at least in Normandy) but not really a way I would call normal, satisfying, fun… or honorable.
