Currently any player can have the maximum rank “Marshal” by playing enough games you can achieve it.
There is not enough motivation, being a mediocre player or being a good player is only the decision of each player.
There is absolutely nothing that rewards good behavior, good levels of competitiveness, there is nothing that penalizes abandoning games.
A mediocre player can advance as much in research as a good player, there is no incentive to be a competitive player.
Competitiveness should be rewarded, encouraging the player to get seasonal prizes if they have a good level in the game.
A system of cups or trophies in certain categories called leagues that rewards players with the most coins or benefits in the game.
Also to correct the abandonment of faction or population in certain factions, the stimulus of winning more trophies should be incentivized if you play with certain depopulated factions.
Today to go up to Mariscal you just have to play in the most populated faction and that’s it.
Mediocrity is rewarded, a premium player, win or lose, investigates his BR quickly, playing badly or playing well doesn’t matter, only those of us who come from competitive games always seek to be good at the game
2 Likes
Lol, yet another wannabe esporter who came to show us how extremely good he is good at killing bots and casuals.
Okay lol.
6 Likes
Enlisted’s target audience is a casual audience, they want to attract the players who aren’t interested in more realistic games like hell let loose
6 Likes
I would remove information about a given player’s rank from the scoreboard. Some players mistakenly interpret this as skill, and it only shows how long a given player spends in the game.
3 Likes
I just don’t agree with the attitude of people like you. People can take this game seriously without being some kind of disillusioned meta creeper who ghastlighted himself into thinking his endevours in game that is clearly casual and full of bots is somewhat competitive
When in fact, “being competitive in enlisted” means only playing 24/7 meta stuff, faction that is popular atm and never play solo at all. Because there would be possibility to lose a match.
Just clownfest. And there’s no way game should support and encourage such toxic mindsets.
They should come up with clan mode, not some toxic meta rankings. Especially since these rankings would affect experience of literally every player. Because rankings are not clearly seperated.
2 Likes
I would say my play is somewhere between mediocre and good, probably closer to mediocre. However I am 60 and retired, along with being bored so I have plenty of time I can spend playing. For a year and a half I only played with the Allies, but since I started playing with the Germans it does not take long to become a Marshall since they seem to win 80% of the time. I’m at the point where my allies are all maxxed, and my Germans are mostly maxxed so I don’t feel the need to climb the ladder of the rankings, I just want a competitve game and to have fun and don’t really worry about my ranking.
2 Likes
Why not go back to those competitive games if you want to sweat for a skin
There is R6S ranked you can play and see if that’s enjoyable playing all day or COD ranked play
1 Like
I don’t understand guys like you, you have such a negative idea of the game and you live in this forum, commenting on post after post as if you were a competitive professional opinionator.
Is there some reward for you for being here all day, you say that you don’t share the idea of a disillusioned meta creeper but you are a meta creeper of this forum because you spend 20 hours a day here.
Friend build yourself differently please it’s time to take a break, you have described yourself what you are in this forum.
Please don’t go off topic, you ruin my post for other players who think the same as me.
Just leave it
4 Likes
Closed developed just in a fight