It’s becaue they are testing new recoil system. MKB42H has higher recoil(almost twice) than MP43 too. The numbers don’t lie, 38/11 is twitce as 22/6
Oh i see, to understand that Soviet/Russian bias is a fact also helps, in Moscow we either get copypaste or useless uderpowered stuff, while Soviets get more toys they don’t need
best hope would be the pz iv f2 but we know that’s never gonna happen it will be a pz 2 c with the 60mm ap belt, i bet
imgaine give Moscow Soviet Kv1… Moscow turning into bot farming simulator immediately.
The recoil of the rifle seems to do it.
It’s a lot like the Thompson recoil in my opinion.
14.4 in stalingrad just saying before he starts nitpicking about it.
Berlin stalinium sovjets get the fedorov which seems by the stats more than capable to compete with anything ( Havent tried )
You don’t know that all boltactions have 50% damage buff and all semiautos have 10% damage buff, do you? They are testing new recoil/damage/dispersion system in Stalingrad, so everything is different.
Tbh, no.
Knew about the dispersion horror & awful stamina drain but seems like I havent missed anything by skipping stalingrad.
I played a lot allies but also a lot axis.
See these:
I do play a lot Moscow Soviet. But look at all these other images, it shows me not really a simple ally player.
There are a lot balancing issues:
Moscow axis can’t fight the Soviet as zh29& pz4 are inferior than their opponents.
Normandy allies having better planes, and some ppl may say jumbo. But axis is bettter in assuler weapons ,machine guns , end game tanks, also fg42s.Theit loss is mainly their players not defending.
Berlin. Axis having very hard time at first, but very very tough weapons than the Soviet in end game fights. The problem is player base issues: no much players playing the axis due to its hard starts. So most of the time is bot rounds.
Tunisia. Used to be very unbalanced. but now other than the player base issue, who can say axis is inferior? Also they are having the shortest capture time in game, very funny to play with.
Let’s back to Stalingrad. See I have almost equal amount of fights here. And you can see the issue with stats here.
In fact, if we jump outside of the Stalingrad topic, I urge them to check all the balancing issues.
is true is very good the best assaul rifle of the game for now
It’s funny how the Germans started using casemate SPG’s as a response to soviet tanks but here we are, no hetzer,no stug III, not even a marder, love the devs
People who ever think I am an ally main should look at my response above. Stop putting such idiotic hat on me.
Like one point is about faction balance and people alreardy discuss about this like its the main point here.
Yeah. Balancing surely is a problem in every campaign, but there are a lot more things I brought up in this post. Most people just ignore them…
Cool.
Axis main loss is of players, competent ones to be especific, people simply don’t and won’t play axis, i blame the devs with their pre-war kar 98’s, mp 40 and bf 110 f2 or another 109 variant, people just don’t want to grind the same stuff time and time again
yes. I really love to see something different.
In Tunisia we can see some different things there. Like berreta m38/42 or amaguerra 39.
They really should rethink the current way of progressing. So much similarities between campaigns.
This would cripple their grind money making scheme but repeated equipment in other campaigns should already be unlocked if you unlocked in one instance or like half the exp needed to unlock, as a compensation
Agree. For mp40, 5 times I have been grinding it…
avt in Stalingrad is having: 10m 14.4 100m 11.8 .
The later one is the issue that causes 2 hits on super man. And try Soviet yourself, you will see the problem with this avt in mid range, really inferior than mkb.
And if people get in close range, I won’t say avt is better than m39 or mp717
It’s actually 10m 15.8, 100m 12.9. Since you don’t know how to datamine, I think I should tell you this.