Will engineers be able to use the Stalingrad Mkb42(H) after merge?

[Twosocks]

What will happen to it?

[_31420124242011]

I hope not

[Shiivex]

Was asked on the news.

Will be answered on next qna.

Let’s wait.

I hope it goes. Like m2, avs, avt and fg

[_31420124242011]

That would actually be so aids good lord

[Shiivex]

Changes nothing from current gameplay on us with m2 and or soviet side with avt or avs.
.

Or

Germans with fg42.

But yes. Aids.

[VoyoMayPL]

Regular troopers shouldn't have full-auto weapons

Guns like: FG42, M2 carbine, AVS 36 and any other that may come in the future shouldn’t be available to troopers, they should be limited to either assaulters or gunners. If every soldier is able to run with full-auto weapon, then we will end up with CoD-like gameplay. Also it renders assaulters useless and completely kills ww2 climate of the game as it’s not historical in any way. I can’t find anything positive in keeping those weapons as they are now, unless you want more brain dead run and g…

[Shiivex]

i just like mkbs

[Twosocks]

I hope it will be semi-autos for early war.

[_31420124242011]

Nah it would since the MkB specifically is great all around even on full auto whereas some care is at least needed to hose people at range with the others
The MkB has none of the drawbacks of any of the other SFs other than maybe damage dropoff, I love the damn thing

[Shiivex]

Thats a solid plan.
Eng on lower br levels have bolts and or semis. And mkbs avts m2s and so on as br goes up

[Shiivex]

The answer above as a complement to reasoning why.

And ye, I love mkb Alot too.

Good looking weapon

[_31420124242011]

@Shiivex

I hope it goes. Like m2, avs, avt and fg

I interpreted this as make it for all classes which I am wholly against since higher tier matches are already nigh unplayable
If it was just keeping them engi only idgaf

[VoyoMayPL]

Tbh I’m affraid auro spam will be common occurance on mid BR already.
We have to wait. Still. Again.

[Shiivex]

Wait we must…

We don’t do nothing more than wait

[Dregomz]

Hope they will, because otherwise i will be left with 20 of them (i have almost as many mp717(r) as MKb42s). Mkb42 is not as strong as Stg44 and Mp43/1 it’s way less accurate with higher recoil and slower rof.

[AdRock2621]

I agree that auto weapons on every rifleman is nonsense. The FG 42 is more like a machine gun, and the M2 carbine is basically an SMG.

The best solutions I can think of it limit the amount of weapons per squad, introduce an auto rifle class, or reclassify current auto rifles.

[GeneralBrus]

I always though that “better weapons = smaller squads” was the most straight forward way to balance these things.

10 mosin Zergs, vs 4 FG42 Elite Soldiers

but the new system with BR sounds promising to me, tho I think most are skeptical here… we’ll see how’s it gonna work out.

[Myrm1don]

I feel like there should be a distinction. Engineers and combat engineers. Engineers as they currently are, and combat engineers being stalingrad versions (with maybe less build options or less squad members)

Also feel like flamer and combat engineers could merge.

[Conscript_Joe]

It’s not a bad idea…

Now, engineers, when in Flamer and gunner squads, can do something unique.

So… why couldn’t engineers in ASSAULTERS squad couldn’t have this unique aspect of bringing some assaulter weapon?

[GeneralBrus]

Combat engineers! What a great idea!

I’ll right away go and open a thread about that.