No matter the time there is always a bot, and the few players there are either new or mentally deficient.
Especially on the German side… you are always in a 3v10
1 Like
Personal experience alert
I used to play moscow axis quite a lot but:
-
my low level gear makes it a pain to play
-
I used to like moscow as for me it was (supposed to be) an early war campaign with dominance of slower gameplay and BA rifles.
If you’ve played moscow, you know it’s not the case for quite a long time now. Thank you idiot who caused this state (and everybody who supporyed him) , I have one less campaign to play.
11 Likes
german players are all likely on berlin since Manpad is tomorrow as well as having the KTH and STG there
1 Like
Please stop lying. What’s the point of these stupid rants? Remember when I called you down last time, you went immediately silent since you maybe realized how foolish you looked.
I do it again:
Here’s your two games in Moscow from today:
Yesterday I played with you, btw:
Why were you so toxic in chat? In the last minutes of the battle you wrote this:
24 Likes
Lmao complains about team but ranks near the bottom, classic
9 Likes
Moscow is generally the campaign that most new players START in.
While there was a large wave of new players that came in over the last month, it seems the number of new players has started to decline again.
Many of the new players have come to realize that they can play in ANY of the campaigns, not just Moscow (which is the first listed one, which is why so many people start there). So they are spreading out to other campaigns and Moscow is less popular.
Funny how often the person crying useless team is down the bottom
2 Likes
When entering the game before starting, the number of players is shown, which by the way is a maximum of 5 on most of the day. Whether the bots are later replaced by players is another issue…
Now your “tests” are from the end of the game when the game puts players in your game… (The already started games that you sometimes enter)
That’s why your “tests” do not serve as such, they are end-game results… It is as if a political campaign started with 2 people and at the end there are 300. The final results will always indicate that there are 300.
Now this affects, because when playing with 3v10 for half the game, it doesn’t matter if there are more people, because those who enter in the middle of the game appear at the beginning of the map and don’t get to do anything… Not to mention that the enemy He already took advantage of his numerical advantage and beat you up.
Now as for toxicity, I don’t usually write to the chat… But put yourself in my place…
You have to play from the new patch with the game getting stuck at random times, you also have a numerical disadvantage not to mention that the players who play with you are mentally deficient who stay 2km from the point shooting instead of going in to defend or attack.
As for the image, you tell me that I came sixth in a defense game where I was the only one who defended. I don’t understand the desire of people with little brains to show off their score in a team game in a defense mission whose purpose is not to kill more than the rest but to defend your points…
Now with all this said, I doubt you will be able to understand where I am going.
The funny thing is how the players in this game are mostly stupid… IT IS A TEAM GAME, IT IS NO USE TO MASSACRE MORE THAN THE REST IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO WIN.
1 Like
What is classic are players like you who believe that the score matters in a team strategy game.
Not to mention that I took a photo in a game where I came 6th when in the vast majority of my games I was in the top 3… But oh well.
Not really. It may look like a team game but it’s closer to a competition for points.
Also if you are a deffender, killing does matter as attackers have limited respawns.
4 Likes
The game itself encourages you to kill more than the rest for experience, not for victory. Which is curious in a team war game.
This leads to people not defending anything and going out there wanting to kill more than the rest, leaving the game aside.
Now, as for me… I care about winning, not killing more than the rest of my team.
By the way, since you are so interested in where the game positions you. I leave you this post that I made in which I spent the entire game on a plane without doing anything and came first.
This most definitely ISN’T a team strategy game.
It’s a grind-based F2P FPS where matches are arranged by putting together 2 teams of random Anons.
You seem to realize that yourself, yet you apparently don’t accept it.
2 Likes
So you say that it doesn’t matter where you attack, it doesn’t matter where you put your mines, it doesn’t matter where you put your respawn points?
I don’t think the same, that people ignore it is another issue.
2 Likes
Are you kidding me? you were the millstone here, who made our team suffer.
It would have been better if you were replaced by a bot since you barely didn’t do anything useful in this game. Some of us had actually to sweat in the end because there was hardly anyone sacrificing bodies on the point.
We would have easily won this if you and actually played like you believe you did.
First point:
You were at least at the objective, I give you that.
Second point:
Behind an ampulomet all the time.
Third point:
Behind an ampulomet all the time.
Fifth point:
Behind an ampulomet all the time.
Maybe you’re talking about yourself? lmao.
In general I don’t give a fck how someone play.
But coming here with complaints about mentally deficient teammates not defending the point, saying that I have a little brain …
You’re something else. Your gameplay definitely not backing your words up.
6 Likes
Another thing, it’s curious that you always take my games where I have more players as “tests” I don’t talk about my last games.
It DOES matter. But I do NOT expect a team of randoms to somehow coordinate by the sheer power of friendship (insert sparkling unicorn here). I practice strategic moves personally, and if someone else does the same, all the better, otherwise too bad, the game goes on either way.
Ok, you’re dumber than I thought…
I’m going to take the trouble to explain each point to you.
1.- she was on point.
2.- Not only did I do several kills with the ampulomet, but my purpose was to create it for the team and I think I remember putting it in the chat… (Spoiler: Nobody used it) And I kept the enemy team quite a bit by the way.
3.- The game was insurmountable and I was holding back the enemy with the ampulomet when we no longer had reinforcements to revive…
Now you continue to take only what suits you to make yourself believe that you are right… You are dumber than I thought…
Checking again, a kill even appears
