When entering the game before starting, the number of players is shown, which by the way is a maximum of 5 on most of the day. Whether the bots are later replaced by players is another issue…
Now your “tests” are from the end of the game when the game puts players in your game… (The already started games that you sometimes enter)
That’s why your “tests” do not serve as such, they are end-game results… It is as if a political campaign started with 2 people and at the end there are 300. The final results will always indicate that there are 300.
Now this affects, because when playing with 3v10 for half the game, it doesn’t matter if there are more people, because those who enter in the middle of the game appear at the beginning of the map and don’t get to do anything… Not to mention that the enemy He already took advantage of his numerical advantage and beat you up.
Now as for toxicity, I don’t usually write to the chat… But put yourself in my place…
You have to play from the new patch with the game getting stuck at random times, you also have a numerical disadvantage not to mention that the players who play with you are mentally deficient who stay 2km from the point shooting instead of going in to defend or attack.
As for the image, you tell me that I came sixth in a defense game where I was the only one who defended. I don’t understand the desire of people with little brains to show off their score in a team game in a defense mission whose purpose is not to kill more than the rest but to defend your points…
Now with all this said, I doubt you will be able to understand where I am going.
The funny thing is how the players in this game are mostly stupid… IT IS A TEAM GAME, IT IS NO USE TO MASSACRE MORE THAN THE REST IF YOU ARE NOT GOING TO WIN.
By the way, since you are so interested in where the game positions you. I leave you this post that I made in which I spent the entire game on a plane without doing anything and came first.
Are you kidding me? you were the millstone here, who made our team suffer.
It would have been better if you were replaced by a bot since you barely didn’t do anything useful in this game. Some of us had actually to sweat in the end because there was hardly anyone sacrificing bodies on the point.
We would have easily won this if you and actually played like you believe you did.
It DOES matter. But I do NOT expect a team of randoms to somehow coordinate by the sheer power of friendship (insert sparkling unicorn here). I practice strategic moves personally, and if someone else does the same, all the better, otherwise too bad, the game goes on either way.
I’m going to take the trouble to explain each point to you.
1.- she was on point.
2.- Not only did I do several kills with the ampulomet, but my purpose was to create it for the team and I think I remember putting it in the chat… (Spoiler: Nobody used it) And I kept the enemy team quite a bit by the way.
3.- The game was insurmountable and I was holding back the enemy with the ampulomet when we no longer had reinforcements to revive…
Now you continue to take only what suits you to make yourself believe that you are right… You are dumber than I thought…
In every comment you make you demonstrate even more how mentally poor you are… The fact that you take half an hour to write it selecting each thing does not make it better.
Anyway, I’m not going to spend any more time on you because it doesn’t make sense.
Above you mentioned that I had remained “silent” in previous posts? I answer you here. I simply saw that one of two.
1.- you are mentally deficient.
2.- You are mentally deficient and you are 15 years old.
bruh you just noob,i face a lot of pro player in axis, even if they are only 3-4 people they can hard carry their team and win, even tho we get a lot of kill or point more than the axis, because they know their objective, and they do it without caring about kd, but you, all i seen you just a camper noob who like to cry a lot, git good and stop blaming your team.
