This should be my second article complaining about this game mode.
To be honest, except for Invasion mode, all other modes are garbage in my eyes. They are not worth wasting your time because they are either very boring or very unfair and you don’t get as much experience as Invasion mode.
So what I want to talk about today is why the assault mode is unreasonable
This game is usually 10V10, and most of them are filler BOTs. They are not worth mentioning and have no effect. There are probably only about 4 to 5 real players on one side.
The multi-point occupation mechanism means that there are not many players in the first place, and the conquest mode also has this problem.
These points are usually not coherent, and the defender can also recapture the occupied points. It looks more like the gameplay of “Battlefield”, but come on, there are 64 players in Battlefield and there are no fake BOTs. This game is It is very likely that there will not be 10 players in the game.
Unless my opponents are all BOTs or rookies, I have no chance of winning when attacking. At the same time, I have learned to avoid the enemy’s main force when defending. If they attack point A, I will immediately go to take back point B, and so on. Running around again is undoubtedly treating the attacker like a monkey.
What’s even more sad is that the attackers still have manpower restrictions. Facing more and more severe offensive tasks, they actually have the same 1,000 manpower as in the invasion mode. Both sides also enjoy the same number of vehicles and resurrection mechanisms.
Please, how can this kind of mode be presented to players without thinking about it? Have the developers really thought through how slim the attacker’s chances of victory are in Assault Mode?
So when I see this bad mode, I will quit directly, unless I am on the defensive side. This is not my fault. The developers did not improve the unfair mechanism of this mode, but just violently forced it on the players.
