Because you will encounter similar enemies against g41 as example.
And you will be encountering most high gear enemies you can see с:
1 Like
I hardly believe that, when not every player has premium, in our clan there are a lot of low level players, we will group up most nights, so where will we end up, in a Berlin sweat fest coz I’m end game or in a low level coz two of my group have low level gear, vehicles?
Not everyone will have an opposite player to be matched to all the time, there will be stomps, mm will not solve stacks on one side or the other, now I might purposefully chose to play the opposition of that stack to help out ie Normandy Allies, in the future I won’t be able to help weaker side… people will get steam rolled and more will get pissed off and likely leave.
1 Like
The posts have already started, telling people to grind our Berlin squads and pacific before the big change, do you really think this won’t happen?
If premium squad gun have a BR based on their gun yes, the ppsh2 in stalingrad is a the same level of the mp40 so it need find player wo use mp38/40 ,mp35, or similiar weapon
But
If all premium squad are max BR no, if premium squad gun are counted as endgame gun, you can forget to use them for chilling
1 Like
Yeah, if I use that Squad, MM will be looking for an equivalent player. I am not worried about that.
I used to enjoy showing off my premium squads to newbies and bullying them more than anything, but I won’t be able to have that kind of fun anymore. But in the long run it will improve the future of the game. 
My lovely girls will be thrown into a fierce battle with the Germans. I am looking forward to it. 
2 Likes
His post doesn’t said the thing you suspect. I think his is telling people to grind Berlin because it might be easier to grind it now before the tech tree is release since Berlin weapon will be on higher level. So it may need more xp to grind in the future.
People don’t buy squads primarily for the XP bonus, they do it for the cool weapon they carry, its how they are marketed and its why each of them have unique weapons for the campaign. To remove that uniqueness by making the gun readily available makes them redundant, would I really want to play that squad just for the XP bonus instead of having a good time with a special weapon? If they were to release an Allied Normandy premium squad comprised of 4 engineers with normal garands, simply no one would give a shit and buy it.
If I will have the option to choose from ANY of my Axis premiums across the campaigns like the new system describes, then I would never use the G41 squad because I already have much more optimal and interesting premiums available. Hell, even a normal engineer squad will be more useful and special than this “premium” if it has 6 guys I can all equip with G41s.
Just remove these sorts of squads and give me a refund in enlisted gold lmao. The company doesn’t even lose money and I’m more likely to purchase in the future if I trust them.
OK so what I don’t understand is what happens the vast quantity of premium squads I have, given the armies are being merged into one faction.
Like it’s OK to have say, one premium per campaign in the current model, because of XP boost, but if these squads are all mashed together into one campaign, most of them suddenly become pointless and I will no longer ever use them?
Am I supposed to just suck up all of the money invested into the game being lost under the new model, or will they be doing something with this?
EG I have a premium assault squad in Axis Moscow, it’s OK in Moscow but it’d be useless in all other campaigns because I already have other squads that do the same thing way better.
Same with Axis Tunisia, I have an Italian SMG premium squad, which is good in Tunisia, but again I wouldn’t ever use them if I suddenly have access to all my other, better squads from other campaigns.
I am kinda concerned about this as I’ve spent a good chunk on money on premium squads in a lot of different campaigns, they are good in their respective campaigns but 80% would be basically pointless in an amalgamated campaign.
1 Like
Lawsuit is not a laughing matter if you are EU customer then you can sue them for misleading customers with product not matching description, or being faulty/defective, they are obligated to lower the price or a refund.
When faced with a defective digital content or service, the consumer should first ask for the problem to be fixed. If this is not possible or done within a reasonable time, s/he would be entitled to a reduction in the price or to terminate the contract and be fully reimbursed within 14 days,
if a defect becomes apparent within two years of the date of supply, the consumer will not have to prove the malfunction. Instead, the trader would have to prove that it had not occurred. For software embedded in goods (e.g. in “smart” fridges), this reversal of the burden of proof would apply for one year, while for long-term contracts (over 12 months), the burden of proof would remain with the trader throughout the contract,
if the trader fails to supply the content, and following a request from the buyer that the trader do so, the buyer would be able to terminate the contract, unless both parties expressly agree to an additional period of time,
EU data protection rules would be fully applicable in the context of these “digital contracts”.
1 Like
Good to know, but hoping Devs just remember us players who invested and do tweak their MM’ing so we can still gain value and have fun in our premiums, you framed it very well, the same applies for vehicles and planes too, I have low level fun things like Chaffee, Ba11, but if I know I will go into Berlin, I would not put them in my line up.
lmao a lawsuit for having a ppd instead of a ppsh in berlin, my brother in christ unless you hope the judges are eternally stuck researching 1941-45, the average judge is going to tell you to fuck off because it’s still “WW2” weaponry
I think that this is taken out of proportion, but there are certain duties of care and expectations we have in regards to transacting with a company like Gaijin don’t think it isn’t possible, that is naive.
But that being said let not even think about it, the devs will feedback to us soon, hopefully there will be some compromise 