this one is a though one for me.
it’s strange, but i like all of them 
.
maps are cool and different everywhere.
so i don’t know 
1 Like
Haven’t touched Berlin at all.
Moscow is nice if you get map variety, feels even for both sides, outside of a few maps they’re balanced, and bolt actions are common.
Normandy has some less map variety and maps are slightly unbalanced or unpolished at times (lack of cover, cliff positions, houses that are hard to traverse, weird spawn points, dunno). Guns feel good there’s MG42 everywhere to watch for.
Maps are nice.
Tunisia has very few green cover (wait, I’m supposed to use the shovel?) or large groups of houses with many floors, which makes snipers and CQC a big thing.
Default tanks feel janky (armored cars resist tank shots and can kill the tanks on some shots, but feels like an axis tank would be nice too).
And allies win very often but I think it’s just because they attack often and it’s actually attackers that have an easier time.
Guns feel fine, although I like that 6 shot carcano.
Overall, I grind Moscow, take a break on Normandy, and struggle in Tunisia.
Tunisia allies bc i get to shoot it*lians
I like them all.
Normandy has the most authentic WWII feeling to me.
I love the snow maps in Moscow.
The streets of Berlin are a fun setting.
Tunisia is a setting that’s new in WWII games, and has the novelty factor, plus destruction mode is pretty cool.
1 Like
- Most balanced (early 25 lvls) campaign,
- Bolt actions can be as useful as smgs
- different layouts: trenches, cities, woods, Castle (monastery) new quarry
- oldest, best patched campaign.
- Stalin approves.
4 Likes
Moscow is live, Moscow is love.
Most balanced arsenal, mains are not retarded, best WW2 atmopshere (not as full with non-historical stuff as other campaigns), diverse and (mostly) balanced maps, no bomb spam like it used to be in France, BA rifle meta…
3 Likes
Wtf
2 Likes
Moscow is so good and well balanced I’m still unable to this day to decide wich faction I prefer playing.
2 Likes
Same. I started with Soviets but I would really miss my Stuka flights.
1 Like
moscow and tunisia, both of those tend to be more balanced and less of a slugfest then berlin or normandy.
Normandy suffers from a severa case of bombers ruining everybody their fun which reminds a bit too much of bfv with it’s little POS pilots that would camp plane spawns and just constantly make bombruns to pad their kdr.
berlin has the issue for me that barely anybody wants to play axis there since you are only getting defence 99% of the time which can be boring as hell really quickly and then there is the laserbeam smg’s for the soviets (have not played there since the spread change so it might be different now)
2 Likes
Ranked in order of preference:
-
Berlin - because it has the best CQB pure infantry combat on some maps and some very good long range maps as well.
-
Normandy - cool aircraft, tanks and weapons on both sides and the maps are usually decent.
-
Moscow - Slower gameplay and bolt actions are king.
-
Tunisia - Last for me because a lot of the maps feel the same, weapons are not that interesting because I’ve used almost all of them before. Too slow gameplay sometimes.
Berlin- I love the atmosphere and the urban battles.
Normandy- It is definitely a cluster fuck but it is the best campaign for that “all out war” feeling. I also love the maps, especially with invasion.
Tunisa- I like the fun tank battles, rush…er destruction is a fun mode. Tunisa has some balancing issues and I feel it just needs a few more maps.
Moscow- I have a love/hate relationship with this campaign. I like the balance between bolt actions and smgs. I think the conquest maps really suck and are quite boring, but the attacking and defending is a lot of fun. I haven’t been back to Moscow in a while so I might have to give it a go again.