This seems like an incredibly anemic update… I don’t wish to be rude but this is basically nothing, at least infantrywise.
A stick Suomi with 900 rpm at br3 must be prioritized since Germany 3 is the weakest in its br rn.
3 Likes
Cromwell 57 mm should be at BR 2, considering her hull armor is only 63 mm and the turret armor is 64 mm, she will be obliterated in BR 3 considering even a BR 2 Pnz 3 tank could kill her with the 50 mm gun. Please reconsider putting her in BR 3, theres better alternatives in BR 3 like the sherman M4A3 with 63.5 mm but has slopped angle making the armor effectively almost 100 mm.
What did femboys ever do to people? (I am slowly getting detached out of reality, please help me)
2 Likes
He’s an attacker.
Both should be priorities.
1 Like
I am just too eager to learn from the best tanker? You can’t blame me for that. And it is not misinformation, I even doubled checked. The two replays I am talking about: the D-Day games on Mar 2nd, 5 kills with 2 spawns (sry for miss-counting one of your shot) and Airfield East with 40-50 kills on Feb 28th. I checked another game, D-Day North on Mar 2nd, 18 kills one spawn.
Anyway, I will check again on Sunday.
2 Likes
you should try checking other games then. only that game and a battle of bulge game did i die immediately. and the battle of bulge on is a common issue that the 2 tank spawns see each other. and d day also forces u to expose urself due to the high elevation difference and lack of gun depression
Well, I have checked some others but you are using tiger 1h. I don’t know, it should be easy 70+ kills on BR5, right? I would say it will be a win if you get 50+ per game, which you have failed so far. I didn’t remember you complaining about depression and map design before and you got blown up by non-BR5 stuff. Anyway, look forward to your Sunday gameplay.
1 Like
Only interesting thing honestly i mean how different is the AVS 20 round compare to AVT 20 round anyway?
Maybe the weird jap naval gun carrier too i guess
Very disappointed!
Call me an idiot for saying the following, but if this is your idea of content for a major update, just don’t do them anymore!
Leave the game as is, just do bug fixing and call it a day. At least this way players won’t feel like they get fcked over every time there’s supposed to be a “major update”.
This is just lame and disingenuous.
People build excitement in anticipation for something nice or useful every three months, just to be cringed out by 2 tanks and 1 plane, all copy-pasted from War Thunder and a magazine change for an already existing gun.
One major update after another, event after event, battle pass after battle pass and 0 content for snipers.
Not even a single weapon. No changes to the squads themselves either, despite player feedback saying they’re weak. Nothing.
Here’s an example of a simple addition:
It’s been 5 years and there still is no Kar98k with ZF41 scope in the game.
You beat your chest up like a gorilla stating that “ONLY weapons that saw mass production or military service make into the tech tree”, right?
Yet we still don’t have a Kar98k with ZF41 scope, of which between 132.000 to 150.000 (!!!) were built during WW2… but instead we have a fictitious Carcano mod.38 with the said scope, of which there are no records of it existing. There is already a suggestion post for it made years ago. I wanted to make a post about it too, but what’s the point if they’re not taken into consideration… it’s just a waste of time.
And for the love of God, please remove that god awful fake obstruction from the sniper Kar98k’s scope…it’s so cringe. All you have to do is just copy-paste the old model. It’s a 10-15min job. I’ve already made a post about it. Can we have some decency, please?!?
I don’t know, man… Do something that is worthwhile for this God-forsaken game… if you still plan on doing so! If not, at least let us know, so we don’t build false expectation and get cringe fatigue from these superfluous and shallow “wanna-be major updates”.
5 Likes
A major update with only 4 things, 3 of which are copy-and-pasted from WT?
How much money have you wasted on saboteurs for not being able to give us something more?
This is like a minor update.
1 Like
if they are against femboys, are they also against nancy girls or tomgirls? what about tomboys? i kinda want to see this stupid discussion on the forum 
2 Likes
I wouldnt talk to that guy tbh he seem to think he’s “the best” and can’t admit it when he’s wrong.
Of course any good player can admit when they are wrong and/or slacking (like when i decide to just give up playing in a match for example)
2 Likes
ER2 gives us more content in a week than DF which takes four months to release a major update.
(There are only 13 people working on ER2)
19 Likes
Glad to finally see some British representation
I hope eventually Britain and Italy have their own independent tree within the Allies/ Axis Tree so they can get so much more content
2 Likes
And you forgot an important detail.
ER2 has original content.
Enlisted has three copy-and-paste vehicles and a variant of an existing weapon.
They literally worked for months on nothingness and a class that NO ONE asked for.
7 Likes
I’d bet that’s more than the crew left on Enlisted
4 Likes
Good point, they model tank variants and models without needing to copy and paste, that gives us more vehicles than enlisted, that has the WT that can copy and paste hundreds of tanks and planes from WWII
Agree, if there are 10 people working on Enlisted, that’s surprising.