Weapon and vehicle Battle Rating changes!

Why bother suggesting things when “you” cherry pick crap… kill the mg 42 like you did type 100 and give it 1200 fire rate

Why the hell should a br2 fighter get two 250kg bombs (stronger than 500lb bombs, adding up to over 1000lbs)?! You do know lbs and kgs are two different measurements right? I don’t even like single 250kg bombs being on planes in br2 as the u.s. does not have a single fighter with over 250lb bombs in br2 (were stuck with 100lb bombs for the longest time) and other nations have multiple planes with 250kg bombs.

Zero cant carry 2 only 1 in the middle have you played warthunder how can you put 2x250kg bombs on a zero… it will have same payload as the Italian fighter at BR I. 50 kg more then the BFs… Soviet and German planes have planes with bigger payloads then this in BR II and US just need its third bomb on the Warhawk.

2 Likes

No, I don’t play war thunder. I figured you meant it would replace the two 60kg bombs with two 250kg…Either way, 250kg bombs should be reserved for BR3. Yes I know germany and russia have big payloads and over performing planes as well. They should be brought in line. There has been way too much power creep in BR1/2 recently

Its too late for that its much easier to give US and Japan 250 kg bomb not to mention thats balance vs BR 3 tanks otherwise you will be caped by them all the time.

US also got 500lb in BR 2 on the premium p 40 so no that would not be powercreep at all and really having 250kg bombs looked to br 3 and upwards just on pricipal is kinda stupid.