The whole game already has that. There were no jumbos in Normandy, or mkb42 in Moscow.
Count on Japanese experimental weapons being in Pacific campaigns.
Sure.
But in case of Japanese, all semi-auto rifle (except for captured rifles), almost all decent tanks that can destroy allied tanks, and anti-tank rocket launchers (except for naval rocket launcher in Manila) had never seen battle. I feels like there are too many such weapons…
Although, for game such weapons are good.
1 Like
If you want to believe a bonk on the head and pointing out the issues with the post is the same as the twitter hate mob you can be my guest, not my problem.
As for the links, those were the reason I pointed out the expected quality in the first place as I have seen well made pacific campaign suggestion posts.
1 Like
Make it interesting then, Japan vs China.
3 Likes
Hi Guys, Now as the developer’s hard work, now I am playing Pacific Campaign. And Its Awsome. And on that year I am just want to contribute to the discussion on the Enlisted forum regarding the addition of the Nippon Army.
I’d like to apologize for my recent forum discussion, which may have seemed more fitting for social media platforms. Upon reflection, I understand that this forum is a place for more focused and in-depth discussions, and my previous topic may not have aligned with the community’s expectations.
Sorry guys
(BTW: Do we need a chatroom at Lobby? XD)