I think combining late Stalingrad with Berlin could work better instead if a new campaign, but that’s just my opinion
How is a different time stalingrand 1942-43 berlin 1945
1 Like
I still belive that the campaigns shall be named east, west, north Africa, pacific and so on, so all types of gear, vehicles and so on could be added.
So we could see even more levels, even more gear, even more squads and so on on the same campaigns.
.
And the argument of “why jumbo was added” could be finally be justified.
1 Like
Yeah that’s what I’m thinking. If they wanted to combine a whole front they would have to add a tier system for the sake of balance
1 Like
They have justfied this
P: Wy you add jumbo
Dev: yes
1 Like
Moscovy and stalingrad are perfect to merge for example but depend if they wont or not do this
They actually did justify as “if it saw combat over that year, it’s always an option to be added”.
Ence why we have jumbos or chaffee.
I still can’t understand the m2 Hyde (not a single gun was deployed to any unit) or m1/m2 (wasn’t even developed yet)
Because yes howewer if they add japan maybe the m1 and m2 have a justification maybe this is a test for the wapons
I don’t think it does, I’d rather not use a starting Moscow tank against a german big cat
German big whats in stalingrand the german big cat is the panzer 4 same for muscovy
Why do we have to test a sten/a m1/m2, piat and so on over the proper gear?
That shall be done when the proper campaign was introduced for it.
There is not a single reason to do so, I m yet to see a feedback post over the sten. What are we testing!?
We should be testing the proper gear for the campaign. Not avaiable weapons for a future campaign. Or, we will miss proper gear right now, and we will play with the same weapons on another campaign, again.
That, it’s just stupid.
We should play only, with proper gear for the current campaign. Only that.
They test even the beretta 1918 e M38 the only difference they work i know is stupid maybe a free test server for player help with this 
instead of put guns in the campagni
42 & 43 is when tigers and panthers started showing up, and as stated above if it existed in that year then the devs will add to that campaign. So I’d rather not have Moscow in 41 be littered with tigers going against t-60s
If combined with Stalingrad
And in battle of stalingrad dont participate tigers if i recall
They would still add it, they Said if was made in that year it would be added to a campaign
This is another matter of the dev are idiot historically moscow and stalingrad have the same equipment
Yeah basically
What’s up with ppl crying for more stuff to unlock?
Every game will have a max lvl that ppl will reach eventually, so what? Do you play the game to grind, or to win the battle? Really don’t understand people these days, back in the day shooters didnt even have anything to “unlock” yet we played them for hundreds of hours and some of us reached 10k hours of playtime with games that only had like 5 maps and maybe 15 guns.
The game literally only starts for me after I have unlocked everything, because I care about the “gameplay” and balance of the game, I don’t want to feel more powerful after playing for many hours, but I love to get new guns and stuff to play around with, thus unlocking “more diversity gameplay” I appreciate. But everything beyond that is just a service for those, who will drop the game anyways as soon as they reached max lvl.
5 Likes
Agree. We also might come from diferent gaming times.
Playing cod1, cod2, medal of honors and so on over and over again with the same weapons, maps what ever, provide me countless hours of fun.
I don’t need yet another weapon, i just want a proper game to play.
1 Like