An idea to test for more likely equal matching of opposing teams in each round would be to try to have the two teams consist of players of similar ranks.
We all seen that most of the times when we have high-ranked teams against low-ranked teams, the result is not fair and most of the time in the roster we see the high-ranked players in the top positions. That says something…
actually matchmaking could be based on how many structures each player have build in their lifetime and it would work far better than the one currently since building rally is worth more than anything else.
1 Like
Ranks don’t mean anything except giving an idea of one’s grind.
3 Likes
Ranking can be obtained through simply grinding away, and playing in a team. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they are good.
1 Like
This.
Or every ten rally points you build is a point towards your rank.
1 Like
Anyone who claims that ranks only show how much a player grinding, just keep checking out the top players on the roster while playing every match and you’ll see how wrong you are.
Not only it solves nothing, it encourages smurfing. Skill based balancing is dumb and it never works. Matter of fact, it is a cheater magnet and it makes everything miserable for those who actually enjoy the game and play well.
Balancing by lineup/weapon (tier/lineup power rating) is the only reasonable way of doing things. Skill based balancing never works and it makes everything super competive and toxic (look at cs go, valorant, lol, etc etc etc .