I can almost touch the irony.
7 Likes
I cannot wait for Manchuria, I am sure there won’t be any problem at all with the Chi-Nu facing the KVs.
Though tbf as of now I don’t see the point of comparing Japanese and Soviet tanks.
Imo KVs are fine at BR3. The issue is that they are too good in a downtier (and too bad in a upptier). But again, having +/-0 BR would solve the issue.
8 Likes
Not even close. Again, german players like to completely ignore the U.S. for some reason. There is no U.S. tank on par with panther g and tiger h1.
Yes, there’s the jumbo and now churchill with good armor, but neither can really take out a panther g very well, then there’s the tiger will good armor + a much larger barrel. You can argue we have the m36 now with good gun, but shit armor w/ open top. Again nothing really compares. It’s either one or the other for u.s., germany gets the luxury of having both
Yes, I don’t understand Elvish very well. I usually just punch Elves.
1 Like
Soviets will recieve so many nerfs - body armor effects Japanese very heavily, while Japanese tanks will practically be 2 BRs behind in effectiveness.
Cant wait for manchuria to completely shake up the game balance.
2 Likes
it simply won’t appear in the game.
1 Like
Probably - even tho the devs have talked about this in the past, I seriously doubt they will manage to implement it in a fair and balanced way.
The developers have said a lot of things in the past. And they haven’t done any of it.
3 Likes
Was br 4 but people complain. Cant make anyone happy
I rule aith kv2
Biggest problem with manchuria are the maps. Soviets vs Japan would need to have more than just couple of maps and they would need to have lots of new chinese building assets. We have barely any map devs left and they are all probably busy making map reworks or active matter missions
2 Likes
Xaxaxaxaxa
If anything, they will nerf Japan (wouldn’t be a surprise with the usual bias eheheh)
7 Likes
are you saying after 5 years of broken FW’s, lack of rockets & generally competent planes against murrica, GE is also getting worthy planes ?
No, that wasn’t the claim at all. I argue tanks impact the battle field more to begin with, but yes germany needs some changes with their planes. Fiat should be br3. The 109 f/trop should get a bomb payload. The FWs should be fixed, even though i deem them useless anyways due to bad turn times. The the 110 g2 was over performing in br3 at the time, but don’t think it should be in br4 either. Maybe it could loose 2 rockets and go back to br3.
The u.s. could also use some love with their low tier planes such as the p40. And would like them to get a br4 plane again finally.
See, I’m actually quite reasonable, more people should play all factions.
g2 is decent at 3 really, not much more powerful than il2 37
1 Like
It’s significantly better with killing infantry compared to il2-37. Il2-37 is more directed toward tank killing. They opperate completely differently. It’s alot closer to the il2 type 3 but even then still not really comparable in infantry killing. G2’s rockets are waaaay stronger and the mark 108s are great for coving vast areas. It really comes down to the ease of use for killing infantry and the ability to cover large spaces all at once that makes it so good. Same could be said about the il2 type 3, but the type 3’s main cas abilities come from the bombs which take a bit more skill to use properly and/or luck. Also harder to cover as big of an area in one go with it, but yes the type 3 still is quite powerful for br3, it’s just not the same type of powerful as the g2. Maybe it needs a small nerf as well. Although i don’t really care that much either, i was just saying the g2 was vastly over performing in br3 at the time, but maybe it’s okay now since br3 stuff has gotten stronger overall
I never seen pictures of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels without beards 